期刊文献+

3种酶联免疫吸附试验检测乙型肝炎病毒前S1及S2抗原的比较 被引量:1

A comparative study on three methods of enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for detecting hepatitis B virus Pre S1 and S2 antigen
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)的3种不同检测方式,选择最佳检测方式,用于临床诊疗。方法用Addcare ELISA800全自动酶免仪、TECAN freedom evolyzer全自动酶免分析系统、手工ELISA法等3种方式对质控品标本和患者血清标本进行乙型肝炎病毒前S1抗原(Pre-S1Ag)和前S2抗原(Pre-S2Ag)检测,并采用统计学方法对其结果进行分析。结果 3种方式检测Pre-S1Ag的批内精密度分别为4.73%、5.38%、11.87%,检测Pre-S2Ag的批内精密度分别为4.91%、5.04%、11.75%;检测Pre-S1Ag的批间精密度分别为6.63%、7.90%、13.26%,检测Pre-S2Ag的批间精密度分别为6.74%、7.81%、12.59%。灵敏度均为100.00%。结论 3种方法有非常好的一致性,均能较好地检测Pre-S1Ag和Pre-S2Ag,Addcare ELISA800全自动酶免仪精密度最好,可进一步提升临床检验质量。 Objective To compare the three different methods of enzyme linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA),to select the best method for clinical diagnosis and treatment.Methods Addcare ELISA800,TECAN freedom evolyzer and manual ELISA method were used to detect hepatitis B virus Pre S1antigen(preS1Ag)hepatitis B virus Pre S2antigen(preS2Ag)in confrontation control product samples and serum specimens from patients with HBV,and the results were analyzed by statistical methods.Results The batch precisions of the three methods to detect pre-S1 Ag were 4.73%,5.38%,11.87%,the batch precisions of the three methods to detect pre-S2 Ag were 4.91%,5.04%,11.75%.The inter batch precisions of the three methods to detect pre-S1 Ag were 6.63%,7.90%,13.26%,the inter batch precisions of the three methods to detect pre-S2 Ag were 6.74%,7.81%,12.59%.All the sensitivities were 100.00%.Conclusion All the three methods have good consistency,which could be used in the detection of Pre-S1 Ag and Pre-S2 Ag.The precision of Addcare ELISA800 is the best,which could further improve the quality of clinical testing.
出处 《国际检验医学杂志》 CAS 2017年第15期2017-2018,2021,共3页 International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
基金 国家卫生和计划生育委员会医药卫生科技发展研究中心专项课题(28-1-6)
关键词 酶联免疫吸附试验 精密度 灵敏度 enzyme linked immunosorbent assay precision sensitivity
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献67

  • 1方峰.早期先天性梅毒诊断和鉴别诊断[J].实用儿科临床杂志,2006,21(22):1525-1526. 被引量:12
  • 2郑怀竟.全国临床免疫学检验室间质量评价十年[M].北京:北京医科大学、中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1998.43.
  • 3Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC), Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS. Medicare, Medicaid, and CLIA programs: laboratory re- quirements relating to quality systems and certain personnel qualifications. Final rule [J]. Fed Regist, 2003, 68 (16) : 3639-3714.
  • 4Medicare, Medicaid and CLIA program: Regulations im- plementing the clinical laboratory improvement amend- ments of 1988(CLIA). Final Rule[J]. Fed Regist, 1992, 57(40):7002-7186.
  • 5Westgard JO, Groth T, Aronsson T, et al. Performance characteristics of rules for internal quality control: proba- bilities for false rejection and error detection [J]. Clin Chem,1977,23(10):1857-1867.
  • 6CLSI. Evaluation of precision performance of quantitative measurement methods: approved guideline second edition Document EP-5A2[S]. Wayne, PA : CLSI, 2004.
  • 7Westgard JO. Six Sigma quality design & control[M]. Medison WI: Westgard Quality Corporation, 2001.
  • 8中国合格评定国家认可委员会.CNAS-CL39:医学实验室质量和能力认可准则在临床免疫学检验领域的应用说明[S].北京:中国合格评定国家认可委员会,2012.
  • 9梁 铭, 林有坤, 梁 伶, 等.南宁地区性病患者家庭儿童感染情况的分析[C].第四届中国西部地区皮肤性病学术研讨会论文集, 2006, 184-186.
  • 10All M E,Hashim U,Dhahi T S,et al. Analysis of pork adulteration in commercial burgers targeting porcine-speciflc mitochondrial cytochrome b gene by TaqMan probe real-time polymerase chain reaction [ J ]. Food Analytie,,d Methods ,2012,5 (4) :784-794.

共引文献53

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部