期刊文献+

输卵管性不孕症患者盆腔粘连对输卵管再通的影响 被引量:1

Influence of pelvic pathologic adhesion on catheter recanalization in patients with oviductive infertility
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨对输卵管性不孕症患者不盆腔粘连输卵管再通术的影响。方法将130例输卵管性不孕症患者根据盆腔粘连情况分为盆腔粘连组(92例)与未粘连组(38例),所有患者均接受输卵管再通术,分析两组患者输卵管再通疗效及远期随访情况。结果盆腔粘连组通畅率为87.1%,未粘连组为96.4%,盆腔粘连组显著低于未粘连组(P〈0.05);术后1a异位妊娠率显著高于未粘连组(P〈0.05)。结论输卵管性不孕症患者盆腔粘连的发生可降低输卵管再通率,增加输卵管再阻塞、异位妊娠的风险,临床应给予重视并及时予以干预。 Objective To investigate the influence of pelvic pathologic adhesion on catheter recanalization in patients with oviductive infertility. Methods 130 cases With oviductive infertility were selected and divided into pelvic pathologic adhesion group (92 cases) and non adhesion group (38 cases), they were all given catheter recanalization, curative effect and longterm follow-up condition of the two groups were analyzed. Results Patency rate of pelvic pathologic adhesion group (87. 1%) was obviously lower than non adhesion group (96.4%) (P〈0. 05) ; ectopic pregnancy rate 1 a after surgery was significantly higher than non adhesion group (P〈0. 05). Conclusion Occurrenee of pelvic pathologic adhesion in patients with oviductive infertility may lower oviduct recanalization rate, increase risk of salpingemphraxis and ectopic gestation, attention and intervention should be given in clinic.
机构地区 南阳市中心医院
出处 《临床心身疾病杂志》 CAS 2017年第4期159-160,共2页 Journal of Clinical Psychosomatic Diseases
关键词 不孕症 盆腔粘连 输卵管再通术 Infertility pelvic pathologic adhesion faiiopian tube recanalization
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献90

  • 1刘西茹,李尚为,李蕾.不育症患者心理因素及干预措施的研究进展[J].生殖医学杂志,2005,14(2):125-128. 被引量:34
  • 2林向容,魏萍,陈晓燕,熊国强.宫腔镜腹腔镜联合手术在诊治女性不孕症中的应用[J].实用医学杂志,2006,22(10):1162-1163. 被引量:9
  • 3申爱荣,李红娟,杨淑玲,封全灵.输卵管性不孕不同治疗方法疗效比较[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2007,23(6):484-485. 被引量:34
  • 4丰有吉,沈铿.妇产科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2010,7(2):60.
  • 5Kupesie S, Kurjak A. Predictors of IVF outcome by three-dimen- sional ultrasound. Hum Reprod, 2002,17(4) :950-955.
  • 6Kupesic S, Plavsic BM. 2D and 3D hysterosalpingo-contrast- sonography in the assessment of uterine cavity and tubal patency. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2007, 133(1):64-69.
  • 7Hamed HO, Shahin AY, Elsamman AM. Hysterosalpingo-con-trast sonography versus radiographic hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of tubal pateney. Int J Gynaeeol Obstet, 2009, 105 (3) :215-217.
  • 8Exacoustos C, Di Giovanni A, Szabolcs B, et al. Automated sonographic tubal patency evaIuation with three dimensional coded contrast imaging (CCI) during hysterosalpingo-contrast sonogra- phy (HyCoSy). Utrasound Obstet Gyneeol, 2009, 34(5):609- 612.
  • 9Sakar MN, Gul T, Atay AE, et al. Comparison of hysterosalpin- gography and laparoseopy in the evaluation of infertile women. Saudi Med J, 2008,29(9) : 1315-1318.
  • 10Dessole S, Meloni GB, Capobianeo G, et al. A second hysterosal- pingography reduces the use of selective technique for treatment of a proximal tubal obstruction. Fertil Steril, 2000,73(5) : 1037- 1039.

共引文献263

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部