美国在南海和钓鱼岛争端中的危机管理模式比较分析——以黄岩岛事件和日本“购岛”事件为例

The Comparative Analysis of American Crisis Management in South China Sea and Diaoyu Islands: Taking Huangyandao Crisis and Japan Purchasing Diaoyu Islands as Examples

2012年4月的中菲黄岩岛事件和2012年9月日本将钓鱼岛"国有化"是两次比较典型的危机事件。在这两次危机中,美国都是作为第三方介入危机管理的,在危机中扮演的是"权力平衡者"的角色,但美国在两次危机中的基本立场和行动方式却存在明显差异。从根本上说,这是因为美国在南海和钓鱼岛的利益诉求不同,而盟国在多大程度上能帮助美国实现其国家利益也决定了美国的支持程度。

Huangyan Island Crisis in April of 2012 and Japan nationalized Diaoyu Islands are two typical crisis cases. In the two cases, US both intervened in crisis management as a third part, playing a power balancer. But American stand-points and patterns of action are clearly different. In essence, this is because US has different interests in South China Sea and Diaoyu Islands, and the degree that allied countries can help US achieve its interests decides the degree US supports them.