系统评价/Meta分析在中医药科研中的应用评价--基于中国期刊全文数据库的文献计量分析

Evaluation of the Systematic Reviews/Meta-analysis Application in Research of TCM Based on Bibliometrics Analysis of CJFD

目的:了解系统评价/Meta分析在中医药科研中的应用情况,为后期研究提供参考。方法:使用计算机检索中国期刊全文数据库2015年前收录的中医药系统评价/Meta分析文献,按照设定的排除标准确定纳入文献,采用文献计量学方法对年代分布、来源期刊、发表机构、核心作者、合作发文、基金资助、研究内容进行统计分析。结果:共纳入文献1 735篇,来源于302个期刊,最早的文献起始于1997年;第一作者分布在515个机构,涉及我国30个省、自治区、直辖市和香港、澳门地区,以及美国、丹麦,21位作者发表论文达到10篇以上,论文合著率为93.0%、合作度为3.76;30.4%的论文获得基金项目资助;涉及的病种按ICD-10分类共19个大类,干预手段为药物干预(69.6%)、非药物干预(24.9%)和联合干预(5.5%)。结论:近年来系统评价/Meta分析在中医药科研中的应用取得快速发展,论文数量显著增长、核心期刊占比较高、发表机构分布广泛、研究团队逐步形成、基金课题较为关注、应用领域不断扩展,但是研究开展的地区分布不平衡、研究质量也存在较大差异,后期应加强相关方法学研究,正确使用和合理解读系统评价/Meta分析,努力提高研究质量。

Objective： This study is to realize systematic reviews/meta-analysis application in the research of TCM and to provide the reference for later studies. Methods： We got systematic reviews/meta-analysis literature of TCM in CJFD before the year of 2015 by the method of computer retrieval, selected the literature according in accordance with the exclusion criteria, and made a statistic analysis on the distribution of time, contents distribution, issuing authorities, core authors, published collaboration, fund-sponsored papers and research contents by a bibliometric method. Results： There were 1735 papers included. The earliest literature began in 1997 from 302 journals. The first authors were distributed in 515 institutions, involving 30 domestic provinces （municipalities and autonomous regions） and the United States, Denmark, Hong Kong and Macao. 21 authors have published more than 10 papers, co-authored papers at a rate of 93.0%. The cooperation degree was 3.76, and 30.4% of the paper got the fund. Interventions include drug intervention （69.6%）, non-drug intervention （24.9%） and the combined intervention （5.5%）. There were 19 disease categories in the literature according to the ICD - 10 categories. Conclusion： Meta analysis application in the research of TCM has achieved rapid development in recent years. The number of papers rose significantly. Proportion of core periodicals was high. Published agencies distributed widely. Research teams formed gradually. Fund quantity was increased year by year. Application fields kept expanding. It is worth noting that regional distribution was not balanced and the research had different qualities. We should strengthen research methodology, use properly and understand reasonably systematic reviews/meta-analysis, and strive to improve the quality of the related research.