期刊文献+

知识、阶级与权力:18、19世纪的贵族博物学 被引量:3

Knowledge,social class and power:Noble natural history during the 18^(th) and 19^(th) Centuries
原文传递
导出
摘要 博物学具有广泛的参与性,被当成最没有阶级性的科学活动。然而,不同阶级参与的方式和程度大不相同,与高雅文化联系在一起的贵族博物学,以财富、地位和权力为支撑,将自然知识物质化和权力化,在国家战略、学术圈和大众文化中都产生了巨大影响力。皇室的博物学兴趣带动了博物学在全社会的流行,班克斯领导下的皇家学会把博物学当成学会的重心,并借助国家权力把帝国博物学纳入殖民扩张战略,猎奇的自然收藏品和昂贵的彩色绘本成为自然知识高度物质化的表现,在跨阶级的博物学网络里不同阶级的处境也完全不对等,甚至动植物的命名也无不彰显着知识的权力。因此,看似跨越阶级的博物学却难以抹去其阶级差异和贵族特色。 Natural history was considered as a classless scientific practice,because everyone from every class seemed have the access to it. However,people from different classes practiced natural history in quite different ways and what they can achieve was also quite different,too. Along with politeness,noble natural history was supported by wealth,social position and power. It greatly influenced national strategies,academia and popular culture. Royal passion on natural history helped with its popularity in public. Royal society led by Joseph Banks took natural history as the most important part of the society and integrated it into imperialism. Curious natural collections and luxury hand-colored books witnessed the high materialization of natural knowledge. There was no equality among different classes in their interaction of natural history practices,either. Moreover,the naming of species even marked the power of knowledge.Therefore,classless natural history was just an illusion. It was impossible to ignore the class character and noble feature of natural history.
作者 姜虹
出处 《科学学研究》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2017年第8期1136-1142,1211,共8页 Studies in Science of Science
基金 国家社科基金重大项目(13&ZD067) 四川大学青年教师科研启动基金项目
关键词 博物学 阶级 高雅文化 皇室 波特兰公爵夫人 班克斯 natural history classes politeness royal Duchess of Portland Joseph Banks
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献85

  • 1特鲁松.卢梭传[M].李平沤,何三雅译.北京:商务印书馆,1998.
  • 2吴国盛.追思博物科学[N].中国社会科学报,2009-8-25(5).
  • 3科恩.1998,《科学中的革命》,鲁旭东等译,北京:商务印书馆,第185页.
  • 4Mason, Stephen F. 1962. A History of the Sciences. Collier Books. p.286.
  • 5沃尔夫.1997,《18世纪科学、技术和哲学史》,周昌忠等译,北京:商务印书馆,第13页.
  • 6Schofield, Robert E. 1963. Lunar Society of Birmingham: A Social History of Provincial Science ahd Industry in Eighteenth - Century England. London: Oxford University Press. p. 11.
  • 7约瑟夫·阿盖西.2002,《法拉第传》,鲁旭东,康立伟译,商务印书馆,第26页.
  • 8Jacob, Margaret C. 1997. Scientific Culture and Making of the Industrial West. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • 9Hans, Nicholas. 1951. New Trends in Education in the Eighteenth Century. London: Routledge. p.151.
  • 10Musson, A. E. ; Robinson, Eric. 1969. Science and Technology in the Industrial Revolution. Manchester: Manchester University Press. pp. 142- 146.

同被引文献28

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部