期刊文献+

中国与日本能源消耗和CO_2排放差异的空间结构分解 被引量:13

A spatial structural decomposition of Chinese and Japanese energy consumption and CO_2 emission
原文传递
导出
摘要 中国是世界上的能源消费大国,其能源消耗总量和CO_2排放总量远高于邻国日本.为分析该现象发生的原因,本文利用结构分解技术(SDA)分别量化分析了两国能耗强度、CO_2排放强度、生产投入结构和最终需求的差异对中日两国能耗和CO_2排放差距的贡献.研究发现,中国高能耗强度、高CO_2排放强度和能源密集型的中间消耗结构是导致中国能耗和CO_2排放远大于日本的主要原因.同时,中国投资和出口拉动型的经济增长方式,使得中国的最终需求结构更倾向于消耗能源密集型产品,这也进一步加剧了中日两国的能耗和CO_2排放差异.本文同时量化分析了各个行业对两国能耗和CO_2排放的影响,分部门来看,钢铁、化学制品、非金属矿物制品、建筑、电力、热力供应等行业是引起中日两国能耗和排放差异的主要行业,也是未来我国节能减排工作所应重点关注的行业. The energy consumption and CO2 emissions in China are always considerably higher than that of Japan. In order to explore the underlying drivers for this difference, this article employs a spatial structure decomposition analysis, and finally quantifies the corresponding contributions of differences in technology, input structure, and final demand to the energy consumption and emission gaps between China and Japan. The results show that China's energy-intensive production technology is the main driver. Moreover, the investment- and export-led growth in China has biased its final demand towards the energy-intensive products, which further increased the energy consumption and CO2 emissions in China. At the industry level, Iron, Chemical Products, Nonmetallic Mineral Products, Construction, Electricity and Heat are the main industries which resulted in China's high energy consumption and CO2 emission.
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2017年第8期2083-2090,共8页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 国家自然科学基金(71673269 71125005 71473244) 北京市社会科学基金(16YJC068) 北京市优秀人才资助项目(2014000020124G172)~~
关键词 能源消耗 CO2排放 投入产出技术 空间结构分解 energy consumption CO2 emission input-output model spatial structural decomposition
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献33

  • 1李景华.SDA模型的加权平均分解法及在中国第三产业经济发展分析中的应用[J].系统工程,2004,22(9):69-73. 被引量:67
  • 2邓彦.投资、消费、进出口贸易对经济增长贡献的实证分析[J].北京工商大学学报(社会科学版),2006,21(2):11-15. 被引量:18
  • 3刘遵义,陈锡康,杨翠红,Leonard K.Cheng,K.C.Fung,Yun-Wing Sung,祝坤福,裴建锁,唐志鹏.非竞争型投入占用产出模型及其应用——中美贸易顺差透视[J].中国社会科学,2007(5):91-103. 被引量:327
  • 4Lenzen M, Murray J, Sack F, et al. Shared producer and consumer responsibility theory and practice[J]. Ecological Economics, 2007(1): 27-42.
  • 5Munksgaard J, Pedersen K A. CO2 accounts for open economies: Producer or consumer responsibility?[J]. Energy Policy, 2001(4): 327-334.
  • 6Peters G P, Hertwich E G. CO2 embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(5): 1401-1407.
  • 7Davis S J, Caldeira K. Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions[C]// Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2010, 107: 5687-5692.
  • 8Fan Y, Liu L C, Wu G, et al. Changes in carbon intensity in China: Empirical findings from 1980-2003[J]. Ecological Economics, 2007(62): 683-691.
  • 9Zhang Y G. Structural decomposition analysis of sources of decarbonizing economic development in China: 1992-2006[J]. Ecological Economics, 2009, 68: 2399-2405.
  • 10Ang B W. Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: Which is the preferred method[J]. Energy, 2004(9): 1131-1139.

共引文献18

同被引文献152

引证文献13

二级引证文献192

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部