心理护理干预对抑郁症患者康复的影响

Effect on Mental Nursing Intervention on the Recovery of Patients with Depression

目的探究心理护理干预对抑郁症患者康复的影响。方法选择该院自2014年6月—2015年12月收治的158例抑郁症患者,对其临床资料进行回顾性分析,将收治的158例患者随机分为两组,对照组和观察组,每组各79例患者。对照组患者采取常规护理,观察组在常规护理的基础上加心理护理干预,比较两组干预前后HAMD、HAMA量表评分、患者出院时服药依从性等情况。结果观察组干预前HAMD评分(29.07±3.28)分、HAMA评分(25.07±3.62)分,与对照组的(28.34±3.92)分、(25.89±3.84)分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);经护理干预后,观察组HAMD评分(13.43±2.35)分、HAMA(9.83±1.92)分,与对照组的(20.45±1.96)分、(13.67±1.03)分比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者依从服药74例,占93.67%;对照组依从服药57例患者,占72.15%,两组对比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对于抑郁症患者在常规护理的基础上给予心理护理干预,能够促进患者康复,值得临床推广。

Objective To study the effect on mental nursing intervention on the recovery of patients with depression. Methods 158 cases of depreszion patients admitted and treated in our hospital from June 2014 to December 2015 were selected and randomly divided into two groups with 79 cases in each, the control group adopted the routine nursing, the observation group adopted the mental nursing intervention on the basis of the control group, and the HAMD, HAMA scale score, administration compliance when the patients were discharged were compared between the two groups. Results The differences in the HAMD score and HAMA score before intervention between the observation group and the control group had no statistical significance（P〉0.05）, [（29.07±3.28）points, （25.07±3.62）points vs （28.34±3.92）points, （25.89±3.84）points], after the nursing intervention, the difference in the HAMD score and HAMA after nursing intervention between the observation group and the control group had statistical significance（P〈0.05）, [（ 13.43±2.35）points, （9.83±1.92）points vs （20.45±1.96）points, （13.67±1.03）points], and there were 57 cases with administration compliance, accounting for 72.15%（P〈0.05）. Conclusion The mental nursing intervention on the basis of the routine nursing for patients with depression can promote the rehabilitation of patients, which is worth clinical promotion.