同量治疗下双眼屈光不正性弱视主视眼与非主视眼疗效对比分析

Comparative Analysis of the Therapeutic Efficacy of Primary Eye and Non-Presbyopic Eyes in the Patients with Ametropic Amblyopia under the Same Quantity

目的探讨同量治疗下对双眼屈光不正性弱视患儿主视眼、非主视眼治疗效果。方法治疗前准确检查主视眼组、非主视眼组双眼屈光不正性弱视患儿视力(国际标准视力表)并记录,根据患儿实际情况提供针对性的治疗方案,记录各组不同时间治疗效果。结果两组双眼屈光不正性弱视患儿经同量治疗1个月后,主视眼组临床总有效率(71.11%)显著优于非主视眼组(31.11%,P<0.05);治疗3个月、6个月和1年后主视眼组、非主视眼组患儿临床总有效率对比并无显著差异(P>0.05);随着治疗时间的延长,对照组临床总有效率随之显著提高(P<0.05)。结论应用同量治疗双眼屈光不正性弱视主视眼、非主视眼短期疗效对比虽具有一定差异,但经中长期同量治疗双眼屈光不正性弱视主视眼、非主视眼均可获得理想疗效,有利于保障患儿生活质量及身心健康。

OBJECTIVE To explore the therapeutic effect of the same amount of treatment on binocular ametropic amblyopia in chil- dren with primary eye and non-dominant eye. METHODS Before and after treatment, the eyesight of the binocular ametropia amblyo- pia patients （eyesight standard） were recorded. According to the actual situation of the children, the treatment regimen was recorded in different time effect. RESULTS The total effective rate （71.11%） of the two groups was significantly better than that of the non- dominant eye group （31.11%） （P〈0.05） after one month of the same amount of treatment. There was no significant difference in the to- tal effective rate between the 3-month, 6-month and 1-year groups （P〉 0.05）. In the control group, the clinical total effective rate rise significantly （P〈0.05）. CONCLUSION Although there are some differences between application of the same amount of treatment of binocular amblyopia amblyopia main eyes and non-dominant eye short-term effects, the same amount of long-term treatment of binocular amygdala amblyopia main eyes and non-dominant eyes are available ideal effect. This was conducive to the protection of children＇ s quality of life and physical and mental health.