经尿道双极等离子前列腺剜除术与经尿道双极等离子电切术治疗前列腺增生的临床比较

The Transurethral Enucleation of the Prostate Compared with Clinical Transurethral Plasmakinetic Resection of Prostate Hyperplasia

目的比较TUERP术与PKRP术治疗前列腺增生临床疗效。方法以该院2013年12月—2015年12月接诊的前列腺增生患者73例,随机分组为剜除组35例与电切组38例,分别行TUERP术、PKRP术,比较两组手术指标及不良反应。结果剜除组患者平均手术住院时长(7.07±1.22)d、手术时长(8.72±2.04)h术中出血量(57.33±9.52)m L远小于电切组(P<0.05);剜除组患者与电切组患者在不良反应率上(8.57%与10.53%)差异无统计学意义,(P>0.05)。结论与PKRP术相比,TUERP术治疗前列腺增生具有更为突出的优势,应作为首选。

Objective Compare themean and PKRP for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia clinical curative effect. Methods In our hospital in December 2013 to December 2015 admissions in patients with benign prostatic hy- perplasia in 73 cases, were randomly divided into two groups as enucleation group 35 cases and electricity cut group （38 cases）, respectively, themean operation, PKRP, compared two groups of operating indexes and adverse reactions. Results Patients with enucleation of the average hospitalization length（7.07±1.22 ）d at the time of surgery long （8.72± 2.04） h and intraoperative hemorrhage volume（57.33±9.52） mL data far less than electric cutting groups（P〈0.05）. Enu- cleation of the patients and the electric cutting groups in the rate of adverse reactions（8.57% VS 10.53%）without a sig- nificant difference （P〉0.05） . Conclusion PKRP compared, themean for the treatment of prostate hyperplasia has more outstanding advantages should be used as the first choice.