不同种植系统口腔种植病例资料的临床分析与报道

Clinical Analysis of Different Cropping Systems and Reported Cases of Oral Implantology Information

目的探讨口腔种植病例采取不同种植系统处理的效果,以便为临床治疗提供参考。方法选取我院口腔科2013年4月至2015年4月接诊的口腔种植病例140例作为研究对象,回顾性分析病例的临床资料,根据种植系统不同分为4组,其中BIB组(n=40)采取BIB种植系统处理,Replace组(n=50)采取Replace种植系统处理,ITI组(n=20)采取ITI种植系统处理,Branemark组(n=30)采取Branemark系统治疗。4组患者均进行1年以上随访,观察4组临床效果,以及随访1年时满意率。结果 4组患者在临床总有效率、随访1年满意率上均基本一致,无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论口腔种植病例采取不同种植系统处理均有不错效果,但临床需合理选择,才能确保临床效果与患者满意率。

Objective To investigate the effect of oral implant cases take different cropping systems addressed in order to pro- vide reference for clinical treatment.Methods Oral implant dentistry patients in our hospital from April 2013 to April 2015 as ad- missions of 140 cases studied,retrospective analysis of their chnical data, according to the different cropping systems are divided in- to four groups, which BIB group （n=40）taken BIB planting system processing, Replace group （n=50）taken Replace implant system process, ITI group （n=20）taken IT1 implant system process, Branemark group （n=30）taken Branemark system treatment.4 patients underwent more than one year of follow-up, clinical results observed and recorded four groups, as well as follow-up of 1 year satis- faction rates,and comparative analysis.Results 4 patients in clinical total effective rate, 1-year follow-up on the satisfaction rate are basically the same,no significant difference （P〉0.05）by statistical analysis.Conclusion Oral Implantology cases take different cropping systems have good treatment effect,but the clinical need a reasonable choice,in order to ensure patient satisfaction and clinical results.