期刊文献+

网络暴力与社会批判的法理学区分

下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来,网络暴力现象越演越烈,对和谐社会和网络环境带来了不利的影响。由于网络暴力是言论表达的异化产物,与同属于言论表达范畴的社会批判相互交织,具有相当的混淆性,故网络暴力与社会批判的区分研究是一个重要的前置性理论问题。文章从法理学视角下的区分体系,对网络暴力与社会批判作了法理认定和区分,以对网络暴力进行更好地规制。
作者 刘昊英
出处 《法制与经济》 2017年第8期153-154,157,共3页
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献34

  • 1郭贵春.“科学修辞学转向”及其意义[J].自然辩证法研究,1994,10(12):13-19. 被引量:14
  • 2郑杭生.当前我国社会矛盾的新特点及其正确处理[J].中国特色社会主义研究,2006(4):32-35. 被引量:51
  • 3[2]John Dewey. How We Think. Boston: D. C. Heath. 1910.
  • 4[3]Robert Ennis, "Critical Thinking: A Streamlined Conception." Teaching Philosophy, 1991,14( 1 ).
  • 5[4]Sharon Bailin, Roland Case, Jerrold Coombs, and LeRoi Daniels. "Operationalizing Critical Thinking: A Curriculum,Instruction and Assessment Model." Paper adapted from Bailin et al., "A Conception of Critical Thinking for Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment," funded by the British Columbia Ministry of Education and Minister responsible for Multiculturalism and Human Rights, May 1993.
  • 6[5]Facione, Peter A.. Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction ( executive summary). In The Delphi Report, Millbrae, CA:California Academic Press. 1990.
  • 7[6]http://www. criticalthinking. org
  • 8[7]Alec Fisher and Michael Scriven. Critical Thinking. Its Definition and Assessment. Edgepress. 1997.
  • 9[8]Kees De Glopper. Book Reviews. Argumentation. Vol. 16.2002.
  • 10[9]R. H. Johnson. ‘The problem of defining critical thinking'.In S. Norris (ed.), The Generalizability of Critical Thinking.Teachers College Press. 1992.

共引文献201

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部