摘要
目的探讨淋巴瘤化疗病人应激反应及其护理干预措施分析。方法将2014年2月—2016年2月在该院肿瘤科治疗的70例淋巴瘤化疗应激反应患者随机分为两组,对照组35例实施常规临床护理,观察组35例给予针对性护理干预措施,比较两组患者护理前后的血压及心率、心理健康程度、护理满意度等。结果护理后观察组收缩压(109.5±10.2)mm Hg、舒张压(77.6±7.8)mm Hg及心率(77.3±7.1)次/min水平明显较对照组的(133.5±11.4)mm Hg、(89.1±8.3)mm Hg、(89.5±8.2)次/min控制平稳,两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);护理后通过对比心理健康程度发现,观察组SAS、SDS评分明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);护理后观察组护理满意度明显优于对照组,两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论通过有针对性的护理干预,淋巴瘤化疗病人应激反应明显降低,增加了治疗依从性,减小患者痛苦,具有积极的临床意义。
Objective Analysis of stress reaction and nursing intervention in patients with lymphoma after chemotherapy. Methods In February 2016 to February 2014 in our hospital oncology treatment of 70 cases of lymphoma chemotherapy stress response patients were randomly divided into two groups.The control group in 35 cases using conventional nursing methods,the observation group in 35 cases uses the targeted nursing intervention method,compared with blood pressure, heart rate and mental state of the two groupsbefore and after nursing,nursing satisfaction. Results Care after the observation group, systolic blood pressure(109.5 ±10.2) mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure(77.6 ±7.8)mm Hg and heart rate(77.3±7.1) times / min level was significantly lower than that in control group(133.5±11.4) mm Hg and(89.1±8.3) mm Hg and(89.5±8.2) times / min control smooth,the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05);After nursing the SAS and SDS scores of observation group were significantly better than those in control group, the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05); Observation group nursing satisfaction was significantly higher than the control group, the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05). Conclusion Through targeted nursing intervention,the stress response of patients with lymphoma chemotherapy was significantly decreased, and the treatment compliance was increased, and the pain of patients was decreased, which has positive clinical significance.
出处
《系统医学》
2016年第11期151-153,共3页
Systems Medicine
关键词
淋巴瘤
化疗应激反应
护理干预
Lymphoma
Chemotherapy stress response
Nursing intervention