期刊文献+

剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫妊娠分娩方式及结局分析 被引量:3

Analysis of the Mode of Delivery and the Outcome of Uterine Scar Pregnancy after Cesarean Section
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探究剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫妊娠分娩方式及结局。方法将浚县人民医院妇产科2014年8月—2015年8月收治的91例剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫再次妊娠分娩产妇,按其意愿及分娩指征分为剖宫产组45例和阴道试产组46例,观察对比两组分娩结局。结果阴道试产分娩成功率为76.1%,中转剖宫产率为23.9%;阴道试产组平均产程时间(9.89±0.85)h高于剖宫产组(9.52±0.83)h、产后出血量(234.56±32.71)m L低于剖宫产组(329.41±33.45)m L、1 min Apgar评分(9.11±0.23)分低于剖宫产组(9.32±0.22)分,P<0.05;阴道试产组先兆子宫破裂发生率8.70%高于剖宫产组,而产后发热率6.52%、新生儿窒息率4.35%略低于剖宫产组15.55%、6.67%,P>0.05。结论阴道试产可降低剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫患者的出血量和1 min Apgar评分,降低产后并发症的发生,建议临床推广使用。 Objective To explore the cesarean uterine scar pregnancy and delivery mode and ending. Methods Xun County People's Hospital in August 2014- August 2015 were treated 91 cases of uterine scar after cesarean section again maternal pregnancy and delivery, according to their wishes and indications are divided into 45 cases of cesarean delivery group and vaginal pilot group of 46 patients was observed compared two groups of birth outcomes. Results The success rate of vaginal delivery trial production 76.1%, transit cesarean section rate was 23.9%; trial of labor group, the average labor time(9.89 ±0.85)h higher than cesarean group(9.52 ±0.83)h, postpartum hemorrhage(234.56 ±32.71)m L lower than cesarean group(329.41±33.45)m L, 1 minute Apgar score(9.11±0.23) points lower than cesarean group(9.32±0.22)min, P0.05; trial of labor group threatened uterine rupture rate of 8.70% higher than cesarean group, and postpartum fever rate 6.52%, slightly lower than the 4.35% rate of neonatal asphyxia cesarean group 15.55%, 6.67%, P 〉0.05.Conclusion The trial of labor after cesarean section can reduce the amount of bleeding in patients with uterine scar and one minute Apgar score, reduce the incidence of postpartum complications, it is recommended clinical use.
作者 夏熙云
出处 《系统医学》 2016年第4期49-51,共3页 Systems Medicine
关键词 剖宫产 瘢痕子宫 妊娠 分娩方式 分娩结局 Cesarean section Uterine scar Pregnancy Delivery Delivery outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献79

  • 1窦伯梅,范明秀.疤痕子宫对再次妊娠分娩结局危险性的分析[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(22):492-493. 被引量:4
  • 2蒋小亚,陈晓云.10年剖宫产率及指征分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2004,19(2):54-55. 被引量:109
  • 3张坚,李萍,谢静燕,徐友娣,玄英华.5年剖宫产手术指征变迁的因素分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,2007,23(1):60-61. 被引量:137
  • 4杨峰,巩苏,张昆,洪兰英.剖宫产后再次妊娠分娩方式的选择[J].实用医技杂志,2007,14(12):1651-1652. 被引量:48
  • 5陈廉,张潇潇.瘢痕子宫妊娠分娩时机及分娩方式的选择[J].中华实用妇科与产科杂志,2010,26(8):594-596.
  • 6李映桃,李小毛,段涛,等.剖宫产热点问题解读[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2010,10:300-301.
  • 7Ma|loy MH. Impact of cesarean section on neonatal morttality rates among preterm infants in the United States,2000-2003 J ]. Pediatrics,2008, 122 (2) :285-292.
  • 8林赴兵;杨洁.近10年剖宫产及相关因素的分析[J]中华临床新医学,2005(04):324-325.
  • 9Baron J, Weintraub A Y, Eshkoli T, et al. The consequences of previous uterine scar dehiscence and cesarean delivery on subsequent births [ J ]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2014,126 ( 2 ) : 120-122.
  • 10Yasmin S, Sadaf J, Fatima N. Impact of methods for uterine incision closure on repeat caesarean section scar of lower uterine segment[ J]. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak,2011,21 (9) :522-526.

共引文献190

同被引文献10

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部