GBR技术在重度牙槽嵴萎缩牙种植中的临床应用被引量：9

Clinical Analysis of GBR Combined with Tooth Implant in the Restoration of Alveolar Large Defects

下载PDF

导出

摘要目的:评价应用单纯引导骨再生术(GBR)修复较大牙槽骨缺损,并进行人工种植牙修复的临床效果。方法:对25例患者40颗缺牙区域存在牙槽骨较大缺损的病例,采用联合GBR的种植修复方式,恢复缺牙区的牙槽骨量。并利用CBCT分别测量术后即刻和术后3、6、12、24、36月牙槽嵴高度和宽度,统计数据后比较。结果:25例患者中1例失败,其余均获成功。经随访36个月,同一患者在不同时期新形成的牙槽骨吸收差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),种植牙形态功能良好。结论:通过单纯GBR技术能修复较大牙槽骨缺损,结合人工种植牙能获得满意的临床疗效。 Objective： To evaluate the clinical effects of simple guided bone regeneration （GBR） combined with tooth implantation to restore large alveolar bone defects. Methods： 25 patients signed consent forms. Alveolar bone defects in the area of 40 teeth were treated with GBR combined with the method of implant restoration. And the CBCT were performed immediately after surgery, 3-, 6-, 12-, 24- and 36- month postoperatively. The crescent ridge height and width were measured and compared. Results： 1 case failed in dental implant, and the others were successful. After 36 months of follow- up, there was no significant difference in alveolar bone resorption （P〉0.05） at the difference time point. Conclusion： We can obtain satisfactory clinical results in the restoration of large alveolar defects through the application of GBR technique combined with immediate dental implants.

作者童庆春张兴文徐嘉莉周玉琴

机构地区上海市嘉定区中心医院口腔科

出处《口腔颌面外科杂志》 CAS 2017年第2期121-125,共5页 Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

关键词引导骨再生术骨缺损种植修复 guided bone regeneration alveolar bone defect implant repair

分类号 R783.6 [医药卫生—口腔医学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献1

1张晓,孙凤,张峰,张智勇.上颌窦底提升自体骨与异种骨移植延期种植的临床疗效评价[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2012,47(10):584-587. 被引量：8

二级参考文献13

1Clavero J, Lundgren S. Ramus or chin grafts for maxillary sinus inlay and local onlay augmentation: comparison of donor site morbidity and complications. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2003, 5(3) :154-160.
2Johansson B, Grope A, Wannfors K, et al. A clinical study of changes in the volume of bone grafts in the atrophic maxilla. Dentomaxillofac Radio1,2001,30(3) : 157-161.
3Buser D, Weber HP, Lang NP. Tissue integration of non- submerged implants. 1-year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants. Clin Oral Implants Res,1990,1(1) : 33-40.
4Zijderveld SA, Schuhen EA, Aartman IH, et al. Long-term changes in graft height after maxillary sinus floor elevation with different grafting materials : radiographic evaluation with a minimum follow-up of 4. 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res,2009,20 (7) :691-700.
5Jensen SS, Terheyden H. Bone augmentation procedures in localized defects in the alveolar ridge: clinical results with different bone grafts and bone-substitute materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,2009,24 Supp1:218-236.
6Bornstein MM, Chappuis V, van Arx T, et al. Performance of dental implants after staged sinus floor elevation procedures: 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res,2008,19(10) :1034-1043.
7Del Fabbro M, Rosano G, Taschiefi S. Implant survival rates after maxillary sinus augmentation. Eur J Oral Sci, 2008, 116 ( 6 ) : 497-506.
8Rickert D, Slater JJ, Meijer H J, et al. Maxillary sinus lift with solely autogenous bone compared to a combination of autogenous bone and growth factors or (solely) bone substitutes. A systematic review, lnt J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2012,41 (2) :160-167.
9Nkenke E, Stelzle F. Clinical outcomes of sinus floor augmentation for implant placement using autogenous bone or bone substitutes : a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2009,20 Suppl 4:124-133.
10Hallman M, Sennerby L, Zetterqvist L, et al. A 3-year prospective follow-up study of implant-supported fixed prostheses in patients subjected to maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a 80:20 mixture of deproteinized bovine bone and autogenous bone Clinical, radiographic and resonance frequency analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofae Surg,2005,34( 3 ) :273-280.