期刊文献+

Numerical stabilities of loosely coupled methods for robust modeling of lightweight and flexible structures in incompressible and viscous flows

Numerical stabilities of loosely coupled methods for robust modeling of lightweight and flexible structures in incompressible and viscous flows
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The growing interest to examine the hydroelastic dynamics and stabilities of lightweight and flexible materials requires robust and accurate fluid–structure interaction(FSI)models. Classically, partitioned fluid and structure solvers are easier to implement compared to monolithic methods;however, partitioned FSI models are vulnerable to numerical(“virtual added mass”) instabilities for cases when the solid to fluid density ratio is low and if the flow is incompressible.As a partitioned method, the loosely hybrid coupled(LHC)method, which was introduced and validated in Young et al.(Acta Mech. Sin. 28:1030–1041, 2012), has been successfully used to efficiently and stably model lightweight and flexible structures. The LHC method achieves its numerical stability by, in addition to the viscous fluid forces, embedding potential flow approximations of the fluid induced forces to transform the partitioned FSI model into a semi-implicit scheme. The objective of this work is to derive and validate the numerical stability boundary of the LHC. The results show that the stability boundary of the LHC is much wider than traditional loosely coupled methods for a variety of numerical integration schemes. The results also show that inclusion of an estimate of the fluid inertial forces is the most critical to ensure the numerical stability when solving for fluid–structure interaction problems involving cases with a solid to fluid-added mass ratio less than one. The growing interest to examine the hydroelastic dynamics and stabilities of lightweight and flexible materials requires robust and accurate fluid–structure interaction(FSI)models. Classically, partitioned fluid and structure solvers are easier to implement compared to monolithic methods;however, partitioned FSI models are vulnerable to numerical(“virtual added mass”) instabilities for cases when the solid to fluid density ratio is low and if the flow is incompressible.As a partitioned method, the loosely hybrid coupled(LHC)method, which was introduced and validated in Young et al.(Acta Mech. Sin. 28:1030–1041, 2012), has been successfully used to efficiently and stably model lightweight and flexible structures. The LHC method achieves its numerical stability by, in addition to the viscous fluid forces, embedding potential flow approximations of the fluid induced forces to transform the partitioned FSI model into a semi-implicit scheme. The objective of this work is to derive and validate the numerical stability boundary of the LHC. The results show that the stability boundary of the LHC is much wider than traditional loosely coupled methods for a variety of numerical integration schemes. The results also show that inclusion of an estimate of the fluid inertial forces is the most critical to ensure the numerical stability when solving for fluid–structure interaction problems involving cases with a solid to fluid-added mass ratio less than one.
出处 《Acta Mechanica Sinica》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2017年第4期709-724,共16页 力学学报(英文版)
基金 the financial support received from the Office of Naval Research (ONR) (Grants N00014-11-1-0833 and N00014-13-1-0383)
关键词 incompressible viscous lightweight partitioned validated discretization solver embedding stably Reynolds incompressible viscous lightweight partitioned validated discretization solver embedding stably Reynolds
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献23

  • 1Fung, Y. C.: An Introduction to the Theory of Aeroelasticity. John Wiley, New York (1955).
  • 2Bisplinghoff, R. L., Ashley, H., Halfman, R. L.: Aeroelasticity. Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, MA (1955).
  • 3Dowell, E. H., Hall, K. C.: Modeling of fluid-structure interac- tion. Annual Reviews of Fluid Mechanics 33, 445-490 (2001).
  • 4Kamakoti, R., Shyy, W.: Fluid-structure interaction for aeroe- lastic applications. Progress in Aerospace Sciences 40, 535- 558 (2005).
  • 5Dowell, E. H.: Some recent advances in nonlinear aeroelastic- ity: fluid-structure interaction in the 21st century. In: Proceed- ings of the 51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, AIAA 2010-3137, Structural Dynamics and Materials Confer- ence, Orlando, FL (2010).
  • 6Shyy, W., Aono, H., Chimakurthi, S. K., et al.: Recent progress in flapping wing aerodynamics and aeroelasticity. Progress in Aerospace Sciences 46, 284-327 (2010).
  • 7Hubner, B., Walhorn, E., Dinkier, D.: A monolithic approach to fluid-structure interaction using space-time finite elements. Computational Methods in Applied Mechanical Engineering 193, 2087-2104 (2004).
  • 8Ishihara, D., Yoshimura, S.: A monolithic approach for interac- tion of incompressible viscous fluid and an elastic body based on fluid pressure poisson equation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 64, 167-203 (2005).
  • 9Bazilevs, Y., Calo, V. M., Zhang, Y., et al.: Isogeometfic fluid- structure interaction analysis with applications to arterial blood flows. Computational Mechanics 38, 310-322 (2006).
  • 10Tezduyar, T. E., Sathe, S.: Modelling of fluid-structure interac- tions with the space-time finite elements: solution techniques. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 54, 855- 900 (2007).

共引文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部