《资本论》及其手稿的三种诠释路径

Three Interpretations of DasKapitaland Its Manuscripts

当代对《资本论》及其手稿主要有以下三种诠释路径:一是以早期西方马克思主义为代表的总体、历史和人本主义的诠释路径,他们强调青年和晚年马克思的"一致性",以及现象与本体、形式与内容、客观与主观之间的历史性与认识论张力;二是阿尔都塞和奈格里为代表的政治、对抗、起源的诠释路径,他们强调"断裂",以及支配与从属、压迫与反抗、起源与结构之间的权力与政治逻辑;三是以新辩证法和价值形式学派为代表的"客观主义"阅读路径,他们依托文本,着重研究了资本主义内部的普遍与特殊、质与量、形式性与实体性之间的矛盾与辩证运动逻辑。各自从不同的侧面突显了《资本论》及其手稿中丰富的哲学思想内涵。

There are three main ways of interpretation of Das Kapital and its manuscripts in the academic circles, first, the interpretation path of totality, historical and humanistic approaches represented by the early Western Marxism. Second, the interpretation path of politics, confrontation, origin represented by Althusser and Negri. They emphasize that ＂break- ing＂ as well as the power and political logic between domination and subordination, oppression and resistance, origin and structure. Third, the interpretation path of objectivism, which is re- presented by new dialectics and school of value-form. They rely on the text and focus on the con- tradictions between the universality and the particularity, the quality and quantity of capitalism, and the dialectical logic of movement. These three inerpretations are different from each other, highlighting the rich philosophical ideas in Das Kapital and its manuscripts.