期刊文献+

贝伐单抗与培美曲塞、顺铂联合治疗晚期肺腺癌的临床效果及对VEGF的影响 被引量:31

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察贝伐单抗与培美曲塞、顺铂联合治疗晚期肺腺癌的临床效果及对血清血管内皮细胞生长因子(VEGF)的影响。方法将107例晚期肺腺癌患者随机分为对照组52例、观察组55例,观察组第1天静滴贝伐单抗7.5 mg/kg+培美曲塞500 mg/m^2,第3天静滴顺铂75 mg/m^2,21 d为1个治疗周期。对照组除不使用贝伐单抗外,培美曲塞、顺铂的用量及用法同观察组。治疗周期结束后进行疗效、不良反应、生活质量评价,并测定VEGF及肿瘤标志物癌胚抗原(CEA)、神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)水平。结果观察组CR 2例,PR 27例,SD 14例,PD 12例,RR为52.7%,DCR为78.1%;对照组分别为1、20、17、14例,RR为40.3%,DCR为73.1%;两组RR、DCR比较差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。观察组与对照组PFS分别为8.2、6.1个月,OS分别为14.3、11.4个月,两组PFS、OS比较差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。观察组治疗后VEGF及肿瘤标志物CEA、NSE水平均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05);对照组、观察组治疗后VEGF及肿瘤标志物CEA、NSE水平均低于同组治疗前(P均<0.05)。观察组发生骨髓抑制15例,肝功能异常9例,胃肠道反应17例,高血压15例,出血或血栓23例,对照组分别为14、10、16、0、22例,两组高血压发生率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组情绪、认知分数高于对照组,疼痛、呼吸困难、疲劳分数低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。结论贝伐单抗与培美曲塞、顺铂联合治疗晚期肺腺癌能降低血清VEGF水平,抑制癌症进展,获得较好的临床效果,但应用过程中应注意控制高血压的发生风险。
作者 张朝巍
出处 《山东医药》 CAS 北大核心 2017年第25期90-92,共3页 Shandong Medical Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献57

  • 1Borgstrom P, Bourdon MA, Hinan KJ, et al. Neutralizing anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody completely inhibits angiogenesis and growth of human prostate carcinoma micro tumors in vivo. Prostate, 1998, 35(1): 1-10.
  • 2Yuan F, Chen Y, DeUian M, et aL Time-dependent vascular regression and permeability changes in established human tumor xenografts induced by an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular permeability factor antibody. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1996, 93(25): 14765-14770.
  • 3Gerber HP, Ferrara N. Pharmacology and pharmacodynamics of bevacizumab as monotherapy or in combination with cytotodc therapy in preclinical studies. Cancer Res, 2005, 65(3): 671-680.
  • 4Jain RK. Normalizing tumor vasculature with anti-angiogenic therapy: a new paradigm for combination therapy. Nat Med, 2001, 7(9): 987-989.
  • 5Crino L, Dansin E, Garrido P, et al. Safety and efficacy of first-line bevacizumab-based therapy in advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (SAIL, MO19390): a phase 4 study. Lancet Oncol, 2010, 11(8): 733-740.
  • 6Lynch TJ Jr., Spigel DR, Brahmer J, et al. Safety and effectiveness of bevacizumab-containing treatment for non-small-cell lung cancer: final results of the ARIES observational cohort study. J Thorac Oncol, 2014, 9(9): 1332-1339.
  • 7Sandier A Gray R Perry MC, et al. Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med, 2006, 355(24): 2542-2550.
  • 8Reck M, von Pawel J, Zatloukal P, et al. Phase III trial of cisplatin plus gemcitabine with either placebo or bevacizumab as first-line therapy for nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer: AVAil. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27(8): 1227-1234.
  • 9Johnson DH, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny WF, et al. Randomized phase II trial comparing bevacizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel with carboplatin and pachtaxel alone in previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic non- small-ceU lung cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2004, 22 (11 ): 2184-2191.
  • 10Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, et al. Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med, 2004, 350(23): 2335-2342.

共引文献109

同被引文献262

引证文献31

二级引证文献150

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部