摘要
在审查实践中,审查员与申请人争论的焦点常集中在解决的技术问题和预料不到的技术效果上。文章将从一个实际的案例入手,对于采用参数、用途表征的权利要求,如何确定发明实际要解决的技术问题,是否取得意料不到的技术效果,进而判断权利要求是否具有创造性。
During patent review, the debate between the examiner and the applicant is often focused on solving technical problems and unexpected technical effects. By taking a practical case into consideration, this article studies the requirements for the right to use the parameters, the ways to determine the pending technical problems and whether unexpected technical results can be obtained in a bid to determine whether the claims are creative.
出处
《江苏科技信息》
2017年第23期8-9,共2页
Jiangsu Science and Technology Information
关键词
创造性
参数
用途
技术问题
技术效果
creativeness
parameters
use
technical problems
technical effects