论我国民事诉讼转型中的诚信原则

The Principle of Credibility in the Transformation of China's Civil Procedure Law

我国既往的研究忽视了诚信原则与民事诉讼转型的内在勾连。受制于民事诉讼转型,2012年修法中诚信原则的确立略显仓促,造成法条安排欠妥、内容欠明晰、定位模糊。诚信原则不仅要调整当事人的诉讼行为,还要在实用主义倾向上更进一步。通过其创造性适用来推进民事诉讼的转型,既应由法官能动地对重大的程序性利益争端行使自由裁量权进行裁判,也应防止法官在程序性纷争的裁判中出现"突袭性裁判",还应由检察机关本着诚信原则对法院的裁判行为予以监督,同时,要接受来自上一级检察机关乃至最高人民检察院的监督。诚信原则首先要通过民事诉讼的个案适用予以落实,最终要靠最高人民法院、最高人民检察院的指导性案例予以推广。

The previous studies in China neglect the inherent connection between the principle of credibility and the transformation of Civil Procedure Law.Subjected to the transformation of the Civil Procedure Law,the establishment of credibility principle in the 2012 amendments was so hasty that it caused a lot of problems,such as the improper formulation of the articles,the unclear content and the indistinct positions.Credibility principle shall not only regulate the party＇s behavior in litigation,but also serve as a further step toward the tendency of being practical.The transformation of civil procedure should be realized by creative application of credibility principle,that is,judicial discretion should apply to the procedure of interests dispute so that the abrupt judgment in the procedure disputes can be avoided,and procuratorate＇s supervision over the judgment of the court on the basis of the credibility principle is possible.At the same time,superintendence from the Supreme People＇s Court and the Supreme People＇s Procuratorate is to be in place.The application of the credibility principle should start from the individual cases of civil procedure,and its wider application should be achieved by means of guiding cases from the Supreme People＇s Court and the Supreme People＇s Procuratorate.