期刊文献+

动机访谈对首发脑栓塞患者抗凝治疗依从性的影响 被引量:1

The effect of motivational interviewing on the compliance of anticoagulation therapy in patients with cerebral embolism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察动机访谈对首发脑栓塞患者华法林抗凝治疗依从性的影响。方法:选取2016年1月至2016年9月收治的首发脑栓塞患者40例,随机分为对照组、干预组各20例,对照组给予脑栓塞护理常规及健康宣教,干预组在表现护理基础上,给予动机访谈,干预前后评估两组患者治疗依从性、治疗信心、治疗意愿等方面。结果:干预组对脑栓塞华法林抗凝治疗的依从性、治疗意愿、治疗信心均高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:动机访谈能有效提高脑栓塞患者华法林抗凝治疗的依从性,优化治疗效果。 Objective: To explore the effect of motivational interviewing on the compliance of anticoagulation therapy in patients with cerebral embolism. Methods: From January 2016 to September 2016,40 patients were conveniently selected and randomly divided into the control group and the intervention group with 20 cases in each group. The control group was given routine medication education. The intervention group was given the motivational interviewing intervention on the basis of the control group. We compared the effect between the two groups. Results: In the observation group, the compliance and willing and confidence of anticoagulation therapy was significantly better than that of the control group(P〈0.05). Conclusion: Motivational interviewing can effectively improve the compliance of anticoagulation therapy in patients with cerebral embolism. It has important significance to improve the effect of warfarin anticoagulation therapy.
作者 王丽萍
出处 《天津护理》 2017年第4期293-295,共3页 Tianjin Journal of Nursing
关键词 脑栓塞 华法林 依从性 动机性访谈 Cerebral embolism Warfarin Compliance Motivational interviewing
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献33

  • 1骆宏,许百华.动机性访谈:一种以咨客为中心的行为改变咨询技术[J].应用心理学,2005,11(1):85-89. 被引量:49
  • 2Hirsh J, Fuster V,Ansell J,et al. American Heart As-sociation/ American College of Cardiology FoundationGuide to warfarin therapy [J]. Circulation,2003? 107(12):1692-1711.
  • 3Wysowski D K,Nourjah P,Swartz L. Bleeding compli-cations with warfarin use: a prevalent adverse effect re-sulting in regulatory action[J]. Arch Intern Med, 2007,167(13) :1414-1419.
  • 4Esmerio F G, Souza E N,Leiria T L,et al. Constant useof oral anticoagulants : implications in the control of theiradequate levels[J]. Arq Bras Cardiol, 2009 ?93(5): 549-554.
  • 5Morisky D E,Ang A,Krouse-Wood M,et al. Predictivevalidity of a medication adherence measure in an outpa-tient setting[J]. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich),2008,10(5):348-354.
  • 6Briggs A L,Jackson T R,Bruce S,et al. The develop-ment and performance validation of a tool to assess pa-tient anticoagulation knowledge [J]. Res Social AdmPharm,2005,1(1) :40-59.
  • 7Van Damme S,Van Deyk K,Budts W,et al. Patient know-ledge of and adherence to oral anticoagulation therapy aftermechanical heart-valve replacement for congenital or acquiredvalve defectsQ], Heart Lung,2011,40(2) : 139-146.
  • 8Morisky D E, Green L W,Levine D M. Concurrent and pre-dictive validity of a self-reported measure of medication ad-herence[J]. Med Care,1986,24(l) :67-74.
  • 9Kim J H,Kim G S,Kim E J, et al. Factors affecting medi-cation adherence and anticoagulation control in Korean pa-tients taking warfarin [J]. J Cardiovasc Nurs> 2011, 26 (6):466-474.
  • 10Kimmel S E,Chen Z,Price M,et al. The influence of pa-tient adherence on anticoagulation control with warfarin : re-sults from the international Normalized Ratio Adherence andGenetics (IN-RANGE) study[J]. Arch Intern Med,2007,167(3);229-235.

共引文献270

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部