摘要
目的:探讨甲卡西酮成瘾者和冰毒成瘾者的决策特点。方法:从某强制隔离戒毒所筛选出甲卡西酮成瘾者45人,冰毒成瘾者41人,从某大学后勤工作人员中招募对照组被试33人,分别使用冲动性量表(BIS-11)、杯子任务研究被试的冲动性水平和决策特点。结果:冰毒成瘾组的冲动性显著高于对照组和甲卡西酮成瘾组;在收益情境下,甲卡西酮成瘾组和冰毒成瘾组选择风险选项的比例显著高于对照组,甲卡西酮成瘾组和对照组比冰毒成瘾组选择更多的适应性选项;在损失情境下,三组被试选择风险选项和适应性选项的比例不存在显著差异。结论:在收益情境下,成瘾组比对照表现出更明显的风险决策偏好,只有冰毒成瘾组表现出非适应性决策。
Objective: To investigate the characteristics of decision-making in Individuals with new drug addiction from compulsory isolated drug detoxification and rehabilitation. Methods: Forty-five individuals with mephedrone addiction and forty-one individuals with methamphetamine addiction from compulsory isolated drug detoxification and rehabilitation and thirty-three healthy controls were recruited. Cups task and barratt impulsiveness scale(BIS-11) were used to measure decision-making and impulsivity, respectively. Results: The impulsivity level of methamphetamine group was significantly higher than control group and mephedrone group. In comparison to control group, methamphetamine group and mephedrone group made more risky choices; control group and mephedrone group made more adaptive choices than methamphetamine group in the gain domain. There was no significant difference among three groups in the loss domain. Conclusion: Addiction subjects exhibit generally greater risk decision-making tendencies than control group. But, methamphetamine group only has adaptive decision-making functional deficits.
出处
《中国临床心理学杂志》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2017年第4期626-629,634,共5页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金
国家社会科学基金项目(15BSH085)
北京市社会科学基金一般项目(15SHB019)
北京市社会科学基金一般项目(14JYB018)
中国政法大学人文社会科学研究项目
中国政法大学重点学科应用心理学
中国政法大学博士创新实践项目(2016BSCX17)资助
关键词
甲卡西酮成瘾
冰毒成瘾
风险决策
适应性决策
Mephedrone addiction
Methamphetamine addiction
Risky decision making
Adaptive decision making