期刊文献+

新型毒品成瘾者在不同情境下的决策特点 被引量:6

Decision-Making for Risky Gains and Losses in Individuals with New Drug Addiction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨甲卡西酮成瘾者和冰毒成瘾者的决策特点。方法:从某强制隔离戒毒所筛选出甲卡西酮成瘾者45人,冰毒成瘾者41人,从某大学后勤工作人员中招募对照组被试33人,分别使用冲动性量表(BIS-11)、杯子任务研究被试的冲动性水平和决策特点。结果:冰毒成瘾组的冲动性显著高于对照组和甲卡西酮成瘾组;在收益情境下,甲卡西酮成瘾组和冰毒成瘾组选择风险选项的比例显著高于对照组,甲卡西酮成瘾组和对照组比冰毒成瘾组选择更多的适应性选项;在损失情境下,三组被试选择风险选项和适应性选项的比例不存在显著差异。结论:在收益情境下,成瘾组比对照表现出更明显的风险决策偏好,只有冰毒成瘾组表现出非适应性决策。 Objective: To investigate the characteristics of decision-making in Individuals with new drug addiction from compulsory isolated drug detoxification and rehabilitation. Methods: Forty-five individuals with mephedrone addiction and forty-one individuals with methamphetamine addiction from compulsory isolated drug detoxification and rehabilitation and thirty-three healthy controls were recruited. Cups task and barratt impulsiveness scale(BIS-11) were used to measure decision-making and impulsivity, respectively. Results: The impulsivity level of methamphetamine group was significantly higher than control group and mephedrone group. In comparison to control group, methamphetamine group and mephedrone group made more risky choices; control group and mephedrone group made more adaptive choices than methamphetamine group in the gain domain. There was no significant difference among three groups in the loss domain. Conclusion: Addiction subjects exhibit generally greater risk decision-making tendencies than control group. But, methamphetamine group only has adaptive decision-making functional deficits.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2017年第4期626-629,634,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(15BSH085) 北京市社会科学基金一般项目(15SHB019) 北京市社会科学基金一般项目(14JYB018) 中国政法大学人文社会科学研究项目 中国政法大学重点学科应用心理学 中国政法大学博士创新实践项目(2016BSCX17)资助
关键词 甲卡西酮成瘾 冰毒成瘾 风险决策 适应性决策 Mephedrone addiction Methamphetamine addiction Risky decision making Adaptive decision making
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献130

  • 1RENJie,GAOJin-zhang,Suo-nan,ZHAOGuo-hu,YANGWu,LüDong-yu,SUNKan-jun,LIChong-yang.Determination of Heroin Based on Analyte Pulse Perturbation to an Oscillating Chemical Reaction[J].Chemical Research in Chinese Universities,2004,20(5):534-538. 被引量:4
  • 2张锋,沈模卫,朱海燕,周星.双线索竞争条件下海洛因戒除者的前注意偏向特性[J].心理科学,2005,28(5):1047-1051. 被引量:14
  • 3周亮,肖水源,何晓燕,厉洁,刘慧铭.BIS-11中文版的信度与效度检验[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2006,14(4):343-344. 被引量:99
  • 4罗天玉,丁道群.人格特质、网络使用动机与网络成瘾倾向的关系[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2006,14(4):365-367. 被引量:30
  • 5Barry, D., & Petry, N. M. (2008). Predictors of decision-making on the Iowa Gambling Task: Independent effects of lifetime history of substance use disorders and performance on the Trail Making Test. Brain and Cognition, 66, 243-252.
  • 6Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to the human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50, 7-15.
  • 7Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Damasio, A. R., & Lee, G. P. (1999). Different contributions of the human amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to decision-making. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 5473-5481.
  • 8van Hoist, R. J., van den Brink, W., Veltman, D. J., & Goudriaan, A. E. (2010). Why gamblers fail to win: A review of cognitive and neuroimaging findings in pathological gambling. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34, 87-107,.
  • 9Verdejo-Garcia, A., Bechara, A., Recknor, E. C., & Perez-Garcia, M. (2006). Decision-making and the Iowa Gambling Task: Ecological validity in individuals with substance dependence. Psychologica Belgica, 46, 55-78.
  • 10Verdejo-Garcia, A., Rivas-Perez, C., Vilar-Lopez, R., & Perez-Garcia, M. (2007). Strategic self-regulation, decision-making and emotion processing in poly-substance abusers in their first year of abstinence. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 86, 139-146.

共引文献77

同被引文献52

引证文献6

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部