期刊文献+

家庭读写环境对儿童词汇发展的影响——母亲语言支架的中介效应 被引量:13

Home Literacy Environment and Vocabulary Development in Children: Mediating of Maternal Verbal Scaffolding
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:考察家庭读写环境对儿童词汇发展的影响以及母亲语言支架在其中的中介作用。方法:采用家庭读写环境调查问卷、叙事任务和词汇测量工具,对154名学前儿童及其母亲进行测查。结果:(1)家庭读写环境、母亲语言支架和儿童词汇发展水平三者间存在显著正相关。(2)家庭读写环境能够显著预测儿童的词汇发展水平,母亲语言支架在两者间有显著的中介效应。结论:家庭读写环境可通过母亲语言支架影响儿童的词汇发展。 Objective: To investigate the impact of home literacy environment and maternal verbal scaffolding on vocabulary development in children. Methods: Questionnaire of home literacy environment, narrative tasks and vocabulary tests were administered to 154 children aged 4 to 7 and their mothers. Results:(1)Both home literacy environment and maternal verbal scaffolding were positively correlated to vocabulary.(2)Home literacy environment significantly predicted vocabulary.Maternal verbal scaffolding mediated the relationship between home literacy environment and vocabulary. Conclusion:Home literacy environment indirectly affected vocabulary through maternal verbal scaffolding in children.
作者 王娟 沈秋苹
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2017年第4期750-753,757,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 国家社会科学基金教育学青年项目"汉语聋童的叙事特征及其叙事能力发展的干预研究"(CHA130165) 江苏省教育科学"十二五"规划重点项目"聋童的社会理解及叙事干预研究"(项目编号:B-b/2015/01/011) 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目成果
关键词 儿童词汇发展 家庭读写环境 母亲语言支架 Children's vocabulary development Home literacy environment Maternal verbal scaffolding
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献78

  • 1乐国安,D.G.弗里德曼,C.帕克.中国的母子关系模式及文化传递[J].天津师范大学学报(社会科学版),1997,17(3):34-41. 被引量:6
  • 2桑标,李燕燕.亲子间心理状态术语、非心理状态术语使用与儿童心理理论的关系[J].心理科学,2006,29(3):553-557. 被引量:18
  • 3[3]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M, West S G, Sheets V. A Comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 2002, 7(1): 83~104
  • 4[4]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M. A new method to test for mediation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Park City, UT. 1998, June
  • 5[5]Duncan O D, Featherman D L, Duncan B. Socioeconomic background and achievement. New York: Seminar Press, 1972
  • 6[6]James L R, Brett J M. Mediators, moderators and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984,69(2): 307~321
  • 7[7]Judd C M, Kenny D A. Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 1981, 5(5): 602~619
  • 8[8]Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173~1182
  • 9[9]Sobel M E. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In: S Leinhardt (Ed.). Sociological methodology 1982. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association, 1982. 290~312
  • 10[10]Sobel M E. Direct and indirect effects in linear structural equation models. In: J S Long (Ed.) Common problems/proper solutions. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1988. 46~64

共引文献7639

同被引文献112

引证文献13

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部