期刊文献+

利奈唑胺治疗ICU革兰阳性球菌感染的疗效及安全性观察 被引量:4

Efficacy and safety of linezolid in the treatment of Gram positive cocci infection in ICU
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨ICU革兰阳性球菌感染给予利奈唑胺治疗的临床疗效和安全性。方法选取ICU革兰阳性球菌感染患者124例作为研究对象,根据随机数字表法分为研究组和对照组,每组62例。研究组给予利奈唑胺治疗,对照组给予万古霉素治疗,观察两组患者的临床疗效及不良反应发生率,并进行统计学分析。结果治疗后,研究组总有效58例,总有效率为93.55%,对照组总有效50例,总有效率为80.65%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组发生不良反应2例,不良反应发生率为3.24%,对照组发生不良反应7例,不良反应发生率为11.29%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论利奈唑胺可有效控制革兰阳性球菌感染患者,提升临床治疗疗效,且治疗过程中安全性较高,值得临床推广应用。 Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of linezolid in the treatment of gram positive cocci infection in ICU. Methods One hundred and twenty-four cases of patients with gram positive coccus infection were select- ed as the research object, all the patients were randomly divided into study group and reference group, with 62 cases in each group respectively. The study group was given Linezolid for treatment, and the control group was given Vancomycin for treatment, the clinical effects and adverse reaction rates of the two groups were compared, and conducted statistical analysis as well. Results The total effective number of patients in the study group was 58 cases, with treatment effective rate of 93.55%, and the total effective number of patients in the reference group was 50 cases, with treatment effective rate of 80.65%. There was significant difference ( P 〈 0. 05 ). The total number of patients with adverse reaction in the study group was 2 eases, with adverse reaction rate of 3.24% , and was 7 cases in reference group with adverse reaction rate of 11.29%. There was significant difference ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion Linezolid can effectively control patients with gram positive coccus infection, and it can improve the clinical curative effect with higher safety in the process of treatment, so that it is worthy of clinical application.
出处 《临床医学》 CAS 2017年第7期37-38,共2页 Clinical Medicine
关键词 利奈唑胺 革兰阳性球菌 感染 Linezolid ICU Gram positive coccus Infection
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献130

  • 1周萍,张葵,张之烽.革兰阳性球菌对利奈唑胺等抗菌药物体外药敏分析[J].临床输血与检验,2011,13(2):142-144. 被引量:4
  • 2林臻,朱小东,刘钒,王萍.309例死亡病例医院感染分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2007,17(9):1091-1093. 被引量:14
  • 3Fluckiger U, Widmer A F. Epidemiology of methicillin- resistant Staphylococcus aureus[J]. Chemotherapy, 1999, 45(2): 121-134.
  • 4Jones R N, Low D E, Pfaller M A. Epidemiologic trends in nosocomial and community-acquired infections due to antibiotic-resistant Gram-positive bacteria: The role of streptogramins and other newer compounds[J]. Diagn Microbiol lnfect Dis, 1999, 33(2): 101-112.
  • 5Herold B C, Immergluck L C, Maranan M C, et al. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in children with no identified predisposing risk[J]. JAMA, 1998, 279(8): 593-598.
  • 6Richards M J, Edwards J R, Culver D H, et al. Nosocomial infections in combined medical-surgical intensive care anits in the United States[J]. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 2000, 21(8): 510-515.
  • 7Vincent J L, Bihari D J, Surer P M, et al. The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe. Results of the European Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care (EPIC) Study. EPIC International Advisory Committee[J]. JAMA, 1995, 274(8): 639-644.
  • 8Fridkin S K, Hill H A, Volkova N V, et al. Temporal changes in prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in 23 US hospitals[J]. Emerg Infect Dis, 2002, 8(7): 697-701.
  • 9Carbon C. Costs of treating infections caused by methicillin- resistant staphylococci and vancomycin-resistant enterococci[J]. JAntimicrob Chemother, 1999, 44 (suppl A): 31-36.
  • 10Engemann J J, Carmeli Y, Cosgrove S E, et al. Adverseclinical and economic outcomes attributable to methicillin resistance among patients with Staphylococcus aureus surgical site infection[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2003, 36(5): 592-598.

共引文献83

同被引文献43

引证文献4

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部