“另行诉讼”抑或“恢复执行”?——论执行和解争议的救济方式

“To Take a New Lawsuit” or “Back to Enforcement”? ——Remedies of Dispute in Settlement of Enforcement

《民事诉讼法》规定的"恢复对原生效法律文书的执行"并不能解决所有因履行执行和解协议而产生的争议。在执行和解的事项超出了原裁判中的诉讼请求、执行和解涉及第三方权益、当事人因达成执行和解而不能适用执行程序、执行和解协议履行完毕后产生争议等四种情况下,执行和解争议具有可诉性。申请执行人主张因受欺诈、胁迫与被执行人达成和解协议时,不应恢复执行,而应另行诉讼。应当赋予当事人程序选择权,多数情况下另行诉讼与恢复执行二者能够殊途同归。此外,允许对执行和解协议进行司法确认,也是立法的应予完善之处。

The ＂resumption of enforcement of the original legal instrument＂ stipulated in the Civil Procedure Law can＇t resolve all disputes arising from the implementation of the settlement. There are four cases that settlement disputes are actionable. They are the settlement beyond the original claims, the settlement with the third party, the parties being unsuitable to apply compulsory execution, and disputes arising after implementing the settlement. If the person applying for the execution was subjected to fraud or coerced, the enforcement should not be resumed, and a new lawsuit shall be filed. The parties should be given the option to choose the remedies. In addition, the legislation improvement will also be reflected in allowing to judicial confirmation of agreement.