期刊文献+

宽体客机机身框段适坠性仿真分析与评估 被引量:2

Crashworthiness simulation analysis and evaluation of wide-body aircraft fuselage section
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对宽体客机机身结构适坠性设计、验证及适航审定需求,分析机身框段不同破坏模式下的吸能特性。建立双层宽体客机机身框段有限元模型,分析其在9.14 m/s坠撞速度下的动态响应特性。针对两种不同的宽体客机机身框段下部结构变形破坏模式,研究得到两种情况下座椅与地板连接处加速度响应和机身各部件吸能情况。仿真结果表明,不同破坏模式下宽体客机客舱空间都得到较好维持,座椅与地板连接处的加速度在人体耐受极限范围内,相同机身部件吸能量不同,其适坠性能可通过改善货舱下部吸能能力得到进一步提升,可为宽体客机结构适坠性设计、分析及评估提供参考。 For the requirements of crashworthiness design, verification and certification of wide-body aircraft, different failure modes of fuselage sections are analyzed. Finite element model of double decks wide-body aircraft fuselage section is developed and the dynamic responses of wide-body fuselage section subjected to vertical impact velocity of 9.14 m/s are analyzed. The failure modes, acceleration responses and energy-absorbing characteristics are obtained and analyzed. Simulation results show that the cabins of wide-body aircrafts are well maintained for the two different cases, and the acceleration responses of junctions between seats and floor are within the limits of human tolerance. The energy absorbed by the same fuselage structures are different for two cases, the energy-absorbing capability of cargo floor structures can be improved by optimizing design, and thus the wide-body aircraft crashworthiness performance can be enhanced, which has a certain reference value for crashworthiness design, analysis and evaluation of wide-body aircraft fuselage section.
出处 《中国民航大学学报》 CAS 2017年第4期36-40,共5页 Journal of Civil Aviation University of China
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项(3122017020) 中国民用航空局科技基金项目(MHRD20140207)
关键词 宽体客机 适坠性 有限元法 失效模式 加速度响应 吸能特性 wide-body aircraft crashworthiness finite element method failure mode acceleration response energy-absorbing characteristics
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献22

  • 1龚俊杰,王鑫伟.复合材料波纹梁吸能能力的数值模拟[J].航空学报,2005,26(3):298-302. 被引量:22
  • 2穆雪峰,姚卫星,余雄庆,刘克龙,薛飞.多学科设计优化中常用代理模型的研究[J].计算力学学报,2005,22(5):608-612. 被引量:152
  • 3Al-khalil M. Overview of aircraft accidents in the last 10 years. CRAHVI Workshop: Crash and Impact Modeling of Structures, 2002.
  • 4European Transport Safety Council. Increasing the surviv- al rate in aircraft accidents: impact protection, fire surviv- ability and evacuation. Brussels: European Transport Safety Council, 1996.
  • 5Fasanella E L, Jackson K E, Jones Y T, et al. Crash sire ulation of a Boeing 737 fuselage section vertical drop test Proceedings of the Third KRASH User' s Conference, 2001.
  • 6Byar A. A crashworthiness study of a Boeing 737 fuselage section. Philadelphia, PA: Drexel University, 2003.
  • 7Fasanella E L, Widmayer E, Robinson M P. Structural analysis of the controlled impact demonstration of a jet transport airplane. Journal of Aircraft, 1987, 24(4) : 274 -280.
  • 8Lepage F. Results of the airliner sub-passenger floor structure drop test. CRASURV, CEAT Test Report S98/ 4449000 part5, 2000.
  • 9Jackson K E. Analytical crash simulation of three compos- ite fuselage concepts and experimental correlation. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 1997, 42(2) : 116-125.
  • 10Jackson K E, Fasanella E L. Crashworthy evaluation of a 1/5-scale model composite fuselage concept. NASA/TM- 1999-209132, 1999.

共引文献33

同被引文献61

引证文献2

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部