被遗忘的文本:五城康雄与普实克的来信——兼论《文学》月刊及其专号的成功

Two almost-forgotten letters from Nishimura Kozo and Jaroslav Pr??ek——A Comment on the Success of Literature and its Special Issue

左联为纠正关门主义的"左"倾错误,促进左翼与非左翼的进步文学以及南北文坛的互动融合,于1933年推出左翼色彩不甚明显的《文学》月刊。刊物一经推出,大受欢迎。为在严酷的查禁政策中夹缝求生,从第2卷第3期起,《文学》连出四期专号,以转移书报检察官的注意。这既保持了《文学》作为一份文艺刊物的生命力与活力,亦从此慢慢扎稳脚跟,成为1930年代生存期最长、影响力最大的文学期刊。笔者在检视文献资料时,发现两封五城康雄与普实克写给《文学》编辑部的信件,这两份被遗忘的文本,展示了执笔者对于中国现代文学的感情和态度,更可从中管窥《文学》及其专号的成功,与其对世界文坛的影响。

In order to correct the ＂leftist＂ mistakes from closed-doorism, strengthened the understanding and communication between the Left League and other progressive literary leagues, and writers of the north and the south, Literature were established by the Left League in 1933,it Soon became one of the most popular publications .In order to survive the brutal censorship policy, from Volume 3 Issue 3, Literature published four consecutive Special Issue to deflect the attention of Newspaper Censorship officials. As a result, Literature not only maintained vitality and vigor as a literary publication, but also became slowly entrenched in the field, survived for a significant period of time, and became the most influential literary periodical in the 1930s. The successful stories of Literature and its Special Issue in world literature could be found in two almost-forgotten letters from Nishimura Kozo and Jaroslav Prusek.