期刊文献+

大体积肾癌患者腹腔镜术式及开放手术治疗的临床效果比较 被引量:2

Clinical comparison of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery in patients with large volume of renal cell carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 观察比较大体积肾癌患者腹腔镜术式及开放手术治疗的临床疗效.方法 选取2013年4月至2016年3月78例大体积肾癌患者,依据患者入院顺序将其分为研究组和对照组,每组39例,对照组给予开放手术治疗,研究组实施腹腔镜术式治疗,对两组围术期相关指标(手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间)、术后并发症情况进行观察比较.结果 研究组手术时间与对照组比较差异未见统计学意义(P〉0.05),研究组术中出血量显著低于对照组,住院时间显著短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);术后研究组并发症总发生率显著低于对照组(P〈0.05).结论 大体积肾癌患者行腹腔镜术式较开放手术治疗具有更显著临床优势,术中出血量显著减少,住院时间缩短,术后并发症发生率有效降低,有较广泛的临床应用价值. Objective To observe the clinical effect of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery in patients with large volume of renal cell carcinoma.Methods Seventy-eight cases of large volume of renal cell carcinoma patients were selected from April 2013 to March 2016 in hospital outpatient department, according to the order of admission, the patients were divided into study group and control group with 39 cases in each group, the control group was given open surgery, the study group was given laparoscopic operation, the related indexes during perioperative period (operation time, intraoperative blod loss, hospitalization time), postoperative complications of the two groups were observed and compared.Results The operation time had no significant difference between the two groups (P〉0.05), intraoperative blod loss in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group,the hospitalization time in the study group was significantly shorter than that in the control group (P〈0.05);the overall complication rate after operation of 5.12% in the study group was lower than the control group of 28.21%, there was significantly differences between the two groups (P〈0.05).Conclusions The large volume of renal cell carcinoma patients underwent laparoscopic compared with operation open surgery has more significant clinical advantages, it can reduce the amount of bleeding significantly and shorten the hospitalization time, reduce postoperative complications, so it has wide clinical application value.
作者 焦湘
机构地区 解放军
出处 《中国实用医刊》 2017年第15期37-39,共3页 Chinese Journal of Practical Medicine
关键词 肾癌 大体积 腹腔镜术 开放手术 Renal cell carcinoma Large volume Laparoscopy Open surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献91

  • 1杨明山,王琳,李希明,吴吉涛,高振利,夏术阶.腹腔镜与开放肾癌根治术的临床效果比较(附102例报告)[J].山东医药,2006,46(21):40-41. 被引量:5
  • 2王琳,张鹏,吴吉涛,高振利.腹腔镜、后腹腔镜与开放肾癌根治术的疗效比较(附92例报告)[J].中国微创外科杂志,2006,6(8):599-601. 被引量:18
  • 3吴长利,邱志磊,陈业刚,郭占军,刘春雨,乔宝民,赵耀瑞,孙光,徐勇,韩瑞发.后腹腔镜肾癌根治术治疗41例肾癌的临床观察[J].中国肿瘤临床,2006,33(23):1356-1358. 被引量:12
  • 4Heuer R, Gill IS, Guazzoni G, et al. A critical analysis of the actual role of minimally invasive surgery and active surveillance for kidney cancer[J]. Eur Urol, 2010,57(2) :223-232.
  • 5Eskicorapci SY, Teber D, Schulze M, et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: the new gold standard surgical treatment for localized renal cell carcinoma [ J]. ScientificWorldJournal, 2007, (7) :825-836.
  • 6Makhoul B, De La Taille A, Vordos D, et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for T1 renal cancer: the gold standard? A comparison of laparoscopic vs open nephrectomy [ J ]. BJU Int, 2004,93 ( 1 ) : 67 -70.
  • 7Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ, et al. Laparoscopic nephreetomy: initial case report[J]. J Urol, 1991,146(2) :278-282.
  • 8Okegawa T, Noda H, Horie S, et al. Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a single center experience of 100 cases[ J ]. Int J Urol, 2008, 15 ( 11 ) :957-960.
  • 9Taue R, Izaki H, Koizumi T, et al. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a comparative study [ J 1. Int J Urol, 2009,16 ( 3 ) : 263-267.
  • 10Steinberg AP, Finelli A, Desai MM, et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for large ( greater than 7 cm, T2 ) renal tumors [ J ]. J Uml, 2004,172(6 Pt 1):2172-2176.

共引文献115

同被引文献25

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部