摘要
目的观察刮痧结合拔罐与单纯刮痧、单纯拔罐治疗肩周炎的临床疗效差异。方法 120例肩周炎患者随机分为刮痧组、拔罐组和结合组,每组40例,分别接受刮痧治疗、拔罐治疗和刮痧结合拔罐治疗,每周治疗1次,共治疗4次。结果 3组患者治疗后SF-MPQ和Melle评分较治疗前均显著下降(P<0.05)。与刮痧组和拔罐组相比,结合组各项评分最低(P<0.05);刮痧组评分略低于拔罐组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。在总体临床疗效上,结合组疗效优于其他2组(P<0.05),刮痧组和拔罐组疗效相当(P>0.05)。结论刮痧和拔罐均可有效减轻肩周炎患者肩部疼痛、改善肩关节功能活动,且刮痧结合拔罐治疗肩周炎的疗效优于单纯刮痧和单纯拔罐治疗。
Objective To observe the clinical efficacy differences between scraping. Methods 120 patients were randomly divided into scraping group, cupping group and comprehensive group, 40 cases in each group. Patients were accepted the treatments of scraping, cupping and scraping combined with cupping once a week, totally for 4 times. Results The scores of SF-MPQ and Melle after the treatment were decreased obviously in the 3 groups (P〈0.05), and the comprehensive group were lower than the other two groups (P〈0.05). Compared with the cupping group, the scores of SF-MPQ and Melle in the scraping group were lower, but without significant difference (P〉0.05). Besides, the therapeutic effect of the comprehensive group was better than the scraping group and the cupping group (P〈0.05), while there was no difference between scraping group and cupping group (P〉0.05). Conclusion Both scraping and cupping therapy can release the shoulder pain and improve the shoulder function, and the comprehensive therapy of scraping and cupping is better to either the simple scraping or the cupping.
出处
《吉林中医药》
2017年第8期832-834,共3页
Jilin Journal of Chinese Medicine
基金
国家中医药管理局重点学科南京中医药大学中医护理学开放基金课题(YSHL0201-04)
关键词
肩周炎
刮痧
拔罐
疼痛
活动功能
scapulohumeral periarthritis
scraping
cupping
pain
activity function