期刊文献+

基于某综合医院的CN-DRGs分组效能分析与评价 被引量:5

Analysis and Evaluation the Efficiency of CN-DRGs Based on the Sample Hospital
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析某综合医院实施中国疾病诊断相关组(CN-Diagnosis Related Groups,CN-DRGs)分组效能,为区域单一医院利用DRGs实施住院服务绩效评价提供理论支持。方法从某综合医院采集2014年和2015年病案首页数据,将数据导入CN-DRGs医院联盟住院绩效平台(2015版),根据导出的分组指标,从分组一致性、病例组合指数(case-mix,CMI)、住院服务效率、学科发展的均衡性4个方面进行比较分析。结果山东省某医院分组一致性与北京相吻合;计算出的CMI值高于北京地区的CMI值;住院服务效率评价效果等同;学科发展的均衡性评价与医院实际相符合。结论 CN-DRGs具有较好的兼容性,对区域单一医院分组效能评价适用,其他地区医院可推行和实施CN-DRGs。 Objectvies To analyze and evaluate the efficiency of CN-DRGs based on the sample hospital from a single region,and to provide theoretical support for hospitals to evaluate service performance using DRGs.Methods Information were acquisited from home page of medical record in 2014 and 2015,and the data were importd into Hospital Union Performance Platform.Based on the data,the four aspects were analyzed and compared in terms of the consistency of the groups,case mix index(CMI),the hospital service efficiency and the balance of the subject development.Results The consistency of grouping between the sample hospital from Shandong Province and hospitals from Beijing was coincident.The value of CMI of the sample hospital was higher than Beijing.The balance of the subject development of the sample hospital conformed to the reality.Conclusions CN-DRGs has good compatibility,which is effectvie for the evaluation of grouping efficiency of a single regional hospital.Other areas and hospitals can implement CN-DRGs.
出处 《中国社会医学杂志》 2017年第4期415-418,共4页 Chinese Journal of Social Medicine
基金 山东省医药卫生科技发展计划项目(2015WSA13002)
关键词 中国疾病诊断相关组 分组效能 疾病分类编码 病案首页 CN-DRGs Grouping efficiency Codes of classification of diseases Home page of medical record
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献50

  • 1马军生,李若山,李永伟.完善我国医疗保险基金监管体系的思考[J].中国卫生经济,2005,24(10):50-52. 被引量:23
  • 2简伟研,胡牧,崔涛,王洪源,黄因敏,张修梅.运用疾病诊断相关组进行临床服务绩效评价初探[J].中华医院管理杂志,2006,22(11):736-739. 被引量:90
  • 3Butler JRG. Hospital cost analysis[M]. London: Kluwer Aca- demic Publishers, 1995.
  • 4Grimaldi PL, Micheletti JA. Diagnosis related groups., a practi- tioner's guide[M]. Chicago:Pluribus Press, 1982: 38-411.
  • 5Commonwealth of Australia. Australian refined Diagnosis Re lated Groups, Version 5.0, Definitions Manual [ M ]. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
  • 6简伟研,崔涛,王洪源,胡牧,黄因敏,张修梅,郭岩.诊断相关组死亡风险分级在医疗质量评估中的应用[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2007,39(2):145-148. 被引量:55
  • 7卢祖洵.社会医疗保险学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2012.
  • 8Hsiao WC,Sapolsky HM,Dunn DL,et al. Lessons of the NewJersey DRGs payment system [J]. Health Aff (Millwood),1986, 5(2): 32-45.
  • 9Golub S. The role of Medicare reimbursement in contemporaryhospital finance[J]. American Journal of Law Med, 1986,11(4): 501-527.
  • 10Mathauer I,Wittenbecher F. Hospital payment systems basedon diagnosis-related groups: experiences in lowland middle-incomecountries[J]. Bull World Health, 2013, 91(10) : 746-756.

共引文献227

同被引文献67

引证文献5

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部