简朝亮论《尚书》学的源流

On the Origin and Development of Book—Shangshu Composed by Jian Chaoliang

简朝亮以为黄帝以前已有《尚书》,认为《尚书》是指上古之史书,《尚书》不独百篇,兼及记言记事之体,孔子没有删《尚书》,分析伏生本《今文尚书》、孔安国本《古文尚书》、杜林本《漆书古文》、梅赜本《孔传古文尚书》中的核心问题,简朝亮是以东汉《古文尚书》为真《尚书》而作出以上判断的。

Jian Chaoliang thinks that before the Yellow Emperor had shangshu, that shangshu refers to the ancient history, it is not only one hundred articles, and belongs to the memoirs of the body, Confucius did not delete shangshu. Jian Chaoliang analysis the center problem offinwen shangshu write by Fu Sheng, guwen shangshu write by Kong Anguo, qishu guwen write by Du Lin and Kongzhuan guwen shangshu write by Mei Ze. Jian Chaoliang thinks the guwen shangshu is true and make the above questions.