摘要
关于有限公司股权之善意取得,我国《公司法》未做一般规定,而是在司法解释中以参照适用《物权法》第106条规定的形式出现,规定较为简陋。理论界和实务界对股权善意取得仍存在较大的意见分歧。在我国当前的制度规范下,通过对比及规范分析,可以发现股权有适用善意取得的现实性。然而,在工商登记的公信力受到双重弱化的情形下,股权善意取得之权利外观基础是薄弱的,导致其不能简单参照适用《物权法》第106条的规定。在具体适用的过程中,需要引入可归责性要件,对第三人的善意认定需要考虑对价是否合理、是否查阅公司章程、是否有相关股东会决议、行为人是否是商人等因素,以完善股权善意取得制度。
About equity bona fide acquisition of limited company,Company Law did not make the general provisions.The Judicial Interpretation provisions equity bona fide acquisition is apply to 106 th provisions of the property law,but the provision is relatively simple.The theoretical and practical circles still have great differences in equity bona fide acquisition.Under the current regulations of our country,we can find out the reality of the application of bona fide acquisition in equity,through the comparison and analysis.However,in the case of double weakening of the credibility of the business registration,the basis of the right appearance of the equity bona fide acquisition is weak.It means we cannot simply refer to the applicable provisions of the 106 th.In the process of concrete application,the factor of imputability needs to be brought in.In considering the third person of goodwill,we should take into account whether consideration is reasonable,whether access to the company's articles of association,whether to have relevant factors such as the shareholders' committee resolution,whether the offender is merchant,and so on,to improve the system of equity bona fide acquisition.
出处
《成都理工大学学报(社会科学版)》
2017年第5期59-65,共7页
Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Social Sciences
关键词
股权善意取得
股权变动
工商登记
债权
equity bona fide acquisition
shares transferring
business registration
contract right