期刊文献+

细胞DNA倍体分析在食管癌临床诊断和疾病程度及预后预测中的价值 被引量:3

Clinical values of nuclear DNA ploidy analysis in diagnosis, disease severity prediction of esophageal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨细胞DNA倍体分析在食管癌临床诊断和疾病程度及预后预测中的价值。方法采用流式细胞术对72例食管鳞癌患者的食管黏膜组织细胞行DNA倍体分析,并将其结果与临床分期、病理检查结果相对照,分析其对肿瘤的诊断价值,同时分析DNA倍体类型与食管癌患者的临床分期、肿瘤分化程度、淋巴结转移的关系。结果对肿瘤临床分期Ⅱ期及以上病变的筛查,DNA倍体方法的敏感度为84.3%(43/51),特异度为47.6%(10/21),阳性预测值为79.6%(43/54),阴性预测值为55.6%(10/18)。随临床分期增加DNA异倍体率逐渐增加[Ⅰ期52.4%(11/21)、Ⅱ期74.2%(23/31)、Ⅲ-Ⅳ期100.0%(20/20)],两两比较差异均有统计学意义(均P〈0.05)。低分化和未分化、中分化者肿瘤组织DNA异倍体率高于高分化者[100.0%(34/34)、90.9%(20/22)比62.5%(10/16)],差异有统计学意义(x^2=5.41、P〈0.05,x^2=11.15、P〈0.01)。有淋巴结转移者DNA异倍体率高于无淋巴结转移者,差异有统计学意义[97.9%(46/47)比72.0%(18/25)](x^2=8.56,P〈0.01)。结论DNA倍体类型分析方法诊断食管癌与病理检查结果有较高的符合率,其可一定程度反映疾病程度及预后。 Objective To investigate values of nuclear DNA ploidy analysis in clinical diagnosis, disease . severity assessment and prognosis prediction in patients with esophageal cancer. Methods Esophageal mucosae separated from 72 patients with esophageal squamous carcinoma were included for DNA ploidy analysis by flow cytometry. Results of DNA ploidy analysis were compared with clinical stage and pathological findings of tumor to assess the diagnostic value. Relations among DNA ploidy type, clinical stage, degree of histological differentiation and lymphatic metastasis were analyzed. Results The sensitivity and specificity of DNA ploidy analysis for esophageal carcinoma with clinical stage Ⅱ and above were 84. 3% (43/51) and 47.6% ( 10/21 ) ; the positive predictive value was 79. 6% (43/54) and the negative predictive value was 55. 6% (10/18). The DNA heteroploid rate increased with clinical stage of tumor; there were significant differences of DNA heteroploid rate among stage Ⅱ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ-Ⅳ[52.4% (11/21), 74. 2%(23/31), 100.0% (20/20)] (P〈0.05). The DNA heteroploid rate of low differentiated/undifferentiated and middle differentiated tumors was significantly higher than that of high differentiated tumor [ 100. 0% (34/34), 90. 9% (20/22) vs 62. 5% ( 10/16 ) ] (x^2 = 5. 41, P 〈 0. 05 ; x^2 = 11.15, P 〈 0. 01 ). The DNA heteroploid rate of lymph node metastatic tumor was significantly higher than of non-lymph node metastatic tumor[97.9% (46/47) vs 72.0% (18/25) ](x^2 =8.56, P 〈0.01). Conclusion Results of DNA ploidy analysis are coincident with pathological examination results in diagnosis of esophageal cancer; DNA ploidy analysis has definite value in disease severity assessment and prognosis prediction.
出处 《中国医药》 2017年第9期1379-1382,共4页 China Medicine
关键词 食管癌 DNA异倍体 流式细胞术 临床生物学行为 Esophageal cancer DNA heteroploid Flow eytometry Clinical biological behavior
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献26

  • 1易甫,贾国良,张荣庆.恒磁场对成人骨髓间充质干细胞增殖及细胞周期的影响[J].医学研究生学报,2005,18(6):533-535. 被引量:10
  • 2原志庆,姜红光,许春雷,千新来,杨万才,王凤荣.食管鳞状细胞癌DNA倍体异质性研究及其临床病理学意义[J].中华病理学杂志,1996,25(3):159-161. 被引量:14
  • 3Konemann S,Schuck A,Malath J,et al.Cell heterogeneity and subpopulations in solid tumors characterized by simultaneous immunophenotyping and DNA content analysis[J].Cytometry,2000,41(3):172-177.
  • 4Arnerlov C,Emdin SO,Cajander S,et al.Intratumoral variations in DNA ploidy and s-phase fraction in human breast cancer[J].Anal Cell Pathol,2001,23(1):21-28.
  • 5Pinto AE,Monteiro P,Silva G,et al.Prognostic biomarkers in renal cell carcinoma:relevance of DNA ploidy in predicting disease-related survival[J].Int J Biol Markers,2005,20(4):249-256.
  • 6Kasprzyk M,Dyszkiewicz W,Piwkowski C,et al.Prognostic value of DNA ploidy:5-year follow-up of patients with respectable squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the lung[J].Lung Cancer,2006,51(2):201-206.
  • 7谢幸,苟文丽.妇产科学[M].8版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:118-119.
  • 8Saslow D,Solomon D,Lawson H W,et al. AmericanCancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy andCervical Pathology,and American Society for Clinical Pa-thology screening guidelines for the prevention and earlydetection of cervical cancer[J]. Am J Clin Pathol,2012,137( 4) : 516-542.
  • 9Won K H,Lee J Y,Cho H Y,et al. Impact of age onthe false negative rate of human papillomavirus DNA testin patients with atypical squamous cells of undeterminedsignificance[J]. Obstet Gynecol Sci,2015,58 ( 2 ) : 117-123.
  • 10Solomon D,Davey D,Kurman R,et al. The 2001 Be-thesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervicalcytology[J]. JAMA,2002,287( 16) : 2114-2119.

共引文献24

同被引文献27

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部