摘要
文章以发生于1996年的南京大学碎尸案的追诉时效问题为切入点,研究了现行1997年《中华人民共和国刑法》以及相关司法解释关于追诉时效及其溯及力问题的规定,指出有关司法解释与现行刑法的规定存在不一致,继而分别分析了该案的追诉时效依刑法规定和依司法解释规定得出的不同结论,即:若依司法解释规定适用1979年《刑法》,该案已过追诉时效;若依现行《刑法》规定,该案的追诉时效则必须待查明案情后方可进行判断。但是,即使该案依法已过诉讼时效,根据该案案情性质和社会影响,亦可依法报经最高人民检察院核准追诉。
The paper uses the limitation of prosecution in the murder case occurred on 1996 in Nanjing University as the starting point.Studies on the provisions of the limitations and the retroactivity in current"criminal law"and the relevant judicial interpretation. Points out that the judicial interpretation is not consistent with the provisions of the existing criminal law. And then analyzes the different conclusions according to the criminal law and the judicial interpretation. That is: if according to the judicial interpretation,the limitation of prosecution has expired; if according to the current "criminal law"provisions,must be to find out the truth of case before the judge in the limitation of prosecution in the case. However,even if the limitation has expired,according to the facts and social impact of the case,can also be apply for the prosecution approval by the Supreme People's Procuratorate.
出处
《忻州师范学院学报》
2017年第4期83-86,共4页
Journal of Xinzhou Teachers University
关键词
刑法
追诉时效
溯及力
从旧兼从轻
核准追诉
criminal law
limitation of prosecution
retroactivity
the former and the lighter
the approval of prosecution