期刊文献+

帕罗西汀与艾司西酞普兰治疗老年抑郁症的疗效及安全性 被引量:8

Effect of paroxetine and escitalopram on clinical efficacy and adverse reactions in elderly patients with depression
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探究帕罗西汀与艾司西酞普兰治疗老年抑郁症的临床疗效及不良反应的影响。方法选取我院2014年3月至2016年3月期间收治的82例老年抑郁症患者作为研究对象,将其随机分为两组,帕罗西汀组和艾司西酞普兰组,每组41例患者。两组患者分别给予艾司西酞普兰和盐酸帕罗西汀口服治疗,治疗前均进行汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)评分,用症状量表(TESS)评定药物安全性,之后在治疗2周、4周、8周时再次进行评分,比较评分结果。结果治疗前两组患者HAMD与HAMA评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后同组间比较,评分显著呈阶梯式逐渐减低;两组间比较,治疗前、治疗2周时无显著差异;治疗4周之后,艾司西酞普兰组效果优于帕罗西汀组(P<0.05)。两组患者GDS评分比较,治疗前无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后同组间比较,评分显著呈阶梯式逐渐减低;两组间比较,治疗2周之后直至治疗6周,艾司西酞普兰组效果优于帕罗西汀组(P<0.05);治疗后8周,评分无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论老年抑郁症治疗中帕罗西汀与艾司西酞普兰均有显著疗效,艾司西酞普兰见效更快,安全性更高。 Objectives To investigate the effect of paroxetine and escitalopram on clinical efficacy and adverse reactions in elderly patients with depression. Methods Eighty-eight elderly patients with depression were selected from March 2014 to March 2016. They were randomly divided into two groups: paroxetine group and escitalopram group, each group of 41 patients The (HAMD) ,Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) score were evaluated before treatment,and the drug safety was evaluated by the symptom scale (TESS). The patients were treated with the control group (P 〈 0. 05). The patients were treated with escitalopram hydrochloride and paroxetine hydrochloride. And then scored at 2 weeks,4 weeks, and 8 weeks after treatment, and the score was compared. Results There were no significant differences in HAMD and HAMA scores between the two groups before treatment (P 〉 0. 05). After treatment, the scores were significantly decreased in the ladder group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups before and after treatment. After 4 weeks of treatment, the effect of escitalopram was better than that of paroxetine (P 〈 0. 05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in GDS score (P 〉 0. 05 ). After treatment for 6 weeks, the effect of escitalopram group was better than that of paroxetine group ( P 〈 0. 05 ). After treatment, the effect of escitalopram group was better than that of paroxetine group There was no significant difference between the two groups (P 〉 0. 05). Conclusion Paroxetine and escitalopram in the treatment of senile depression have a significant effect, and escitalopram is more effective and safer.
作者 杨帆
出处 《中国老年保健医学》 2017年第4期51-53,共3页 Chinese Journal of Geriatric Care
关键词 老年抑郁症 帕罗西汀 艾司西酞普兰 不良反应 senile depression, paroxetine, escitalopram, adverse reactions
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献68

  • 1梁琨,范雪云.西酞普兰与米安色林治疗老年抑郁症对照研究[J].临床精神医学杂志,2006,16(1):32-33. 被引量:9
  • 2刘华莉,杜海英,刘玉,李红.西酞普兰治疗老年期抑郁症疗效观察[J].临床精神医学杂志,2006,16(2):88-89. 被引量:15
  • 3Cuijpers P, van Straten A, Oppen P, et al. Are psychological and phar- macologic interventions equally effective in the treatment of adult depres- sive disorders? A meta-analysis of comparative studies [ J ]. J Clin Psy- chiatry. 2008,69 : 1675 - 1685.
  • 4Michael B, First MD, Robert L, et al. SCID-I/P. Biometrics Research Department [ J ], New York State Psychiatric Institute,2002:101 -112.
  • 5江开达主编.精神药理学.第4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2007.420-421.
  • 6Kennedy SH, Anderson HF, Lam RW. Efficacy of escitalopram in the rteatment of major depressive disorder compared with conventional selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and venlafaxine XR : a meta-analysis. Psychiatry Neurosci ,2006,31 : 122-131.
  • 7Sanchez C, Bergqvist PB, Brennum LT, et al. Escitalopram, the Senantiomer of citalopram, is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor with potent effects in animal models predictive of antidepressant and anxiolytic activities. Psychopharmacology (Berl) ,2003,167:353 -362.
  • 8Auquier P, Robitail S, Llorea PM, et al. Comparison of escitalopram and citalopram efficacy :a meta-analysis. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract,2003,7: 259-268.
  • 9Kasper S, Spadeone C, Verpillat P, et al. Onset of action of escitalopram compared with other antidepressants:resuhs of a pooled analysis. Int Clin Psychopharmacology ,2006,21 : 105-110.
  • 10Waugh J, Goa KL. Escitalopram:a review of its use in the management of major depressive and anxiety disorders [J]. CNS Drugs,2003,17(5):343-362.

共引文献225

同被引文献66

引证文献8

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部