期刊文献+

用户体验视角下的个人云存储服务质量评价研究 被引量:10

Personal Cloud Storage Service Quality Evaluation Based on User Experience
原文传递
导出
摘要 【目的/意义】个人云存储服务质量的有效评价对用户选择适合的个人云存储服务供应商具有重要的参考价值。【方法/过程】本文在参考已有文献的基础上,结合个人云存储服务的特点,构建了用户体验视角下的个人云存储服务质量评价体系。运用层次分析法计算评价指标权重,并选择四个典型的个人云存储服务平台进行评价。【结果/结论】研究发现,版本更新、存储文件的安全性、系统稳定性、可靠性、补偿性、身份信息和授权安全、响应与传输速度、产品品牌实力、容灾策略9项指标对个人云存储服务质量的影响较大。评价结果为个人云存储服务供应商改进服务质量提供方向,为用户选择个人云存储服务平台提供依据。 【Purpose/significance】It has important reference value for end-users to select the right personal cloud storage service provider according to evaluate personal cloud storage service quality effectively.【Method/process】The paper,on the basic of referencing existing literature,combines the characteristics of personal cloud storage service,establishes an evaluation index system of personal cloud storage service from the perspective of user experience(Qo E),calculates the weight of each evaluation index by applying AHP method.And four typical personal cloud storage service platforms are chosen to evaluate.【Result/conclusion】The research results show that nine indicators have great influence on personal cloud storage service quality including version updating,safety of storage files,system stability,system reliability,compensation,identity information and authorization security,response and transmission speed,product brand strength and disaster strategy.The evaluation results provide direction for improving quality of service of personal cloud storage service providers and offer evidence for end-users to choose personal cloud storage service platform.
出处 《情报科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第9期12-17,共6页 Information Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71603075)
关键词 个人云存储 服务质量 云服务评价 用户体验 层次分析法 personal cloud storage service quality cloud service evaluation user experience analytic hierarchy process method
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献144

  • 1黄菁,王文东.一种可量化用户QoE的业务实施技术方案[J].北京邮电大学学报,2007,30(2):106-109. 被引量:9
  • 2Wu Wan-Min, Arefin A, Rivas R. Quality of experience in distributed interactive multimedia environments: Toward a theoretical framework//Proceedings of the MM'09. 2009: 481-490.
  • 3Siller M, Woods J. QoE improvement of multimedia trans mission//Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference, 2003, Ⅱ: 821-825.
  • 4O~ Neil Timothy M. Quality of experience and quality of service, For IP video confereneing. Director of Technical Marketing of Polycom Video Communications, White Paper by Polycom, 2005.
  • 5ITU-T: Definition of quality of experience (QoE). Interna- tional TelecommunieationUnion, Liaison Statement, Ref. TD 109rev2 (PLEN/12), 2007.
  • 6Garcia M, Canovas A, Edo Met a[. A QoE management system for ubiquitous IPTV devices//Proceedings of the 2009 Third International Conference on Mobile Ubiquitous Com- puting, Systems, Services and Technologies. 2009:147-152.
  • 7Volk M, Sterle J, Sedlar U et al. An approach to modeling and control of QoE in next generation networks. IEEE Com- munications Magazine, 2010, 48(8): 126-135.
  • 8Ries M, Froehlich P, Schatz R. QoE evaluation of high-defi- nition IPTV services//Proceedings of the Radioelektronika (Radioelektronika). 2011:1-5.
  • 9Barakovi6 S, Barakovic J, Bajri6 H. QoE dimensions and QoE measurement of NGN services//Proceedings of the Tel- ecommunications Forum (TELFOR 2010). 2010: 15-18.
  • 10Moiler S, Engelbreeht K P, Kuhnel C, Wechsung I, Weiss B. A taxonomy of quality of service and Quality of Experience of multimodal human-machine interaction//Proceedings of the International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEx2009). 2009:7-12.

共引文献191

同被引文献141

引证文献10

二级引证文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部