期刊文献+

PISA2015科学素养测试公开试题分析及教学启示 被引量:12

Analysis of PISA2015 Released Items about Scientific Literacy and Pedagogical Implication
下载PDF
导出
摘要 PISA2015科学素养测试公开试题在能力要求方面主要考察学生在"科学地解释数据和证据""科学地解释现象"能力标准上的表现,在具体的评价试题设计方面所涉及的科学知识主要是"程序性知识"和"内容性知识",对背景范围的关注主要集中在个人、地区/国家情景,对于试题所属科学内容主题则都有涉猎,大多数试题属于中等水平题目,在试题形式方面倾向于以简单选择题的形式呈现。根据PISA2015科学素养测试公开试题的特点,建议在科学教学实践过程中,注重学生对科学现象的解释,强化数据和证据的应用;关注科学知识建立过程的程序性知识,加强学生对科学本质的理解;增加科学知识产生的真实个人、地区/全球背景介绍,丰富科学教学素材。 Through the analysis of PISA2015 scientific literacy test questions, the researcher found that it primarily tests the students' performance in competencies of "scientific interpretation of data and evidence" and "scientific explanation of phenomenon", in content and procedural knowledge, in personal and local/national contexts. Most of those items involve the whole science topic, belong to medium level in the deep of knowledge, and present in simple choice. According to the items characteristics, there are some recommendations for science teaching, such as paying attention to the explanation for science phenomena and the application of science data and evidence, laying emphasis on the procedural knowledge about the process to build science knowledge and students' comprehend for the nature of science, and increasing the real personal and local/national background introduction of producing the science knowledge in order to enrich the teaching materials.
作者 李川
出处 《外国中小学教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第9期69-76,共8页 Primary & Secondary Schooling Abroad
关键词 PISA2015 科学素养 试题分析 PISA2015 scientific literacy test analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献28

  • 1谢徐萍,张苹.Literacy:一个生态学的隐喻[J].学术论坛,2007,30(6):186-190. 被引量:3
  • 2林志华 孟鸿伟.当今世界教育热点追踪[N].中国教育报,2002-05-25.
  • 3Glvnda Hull and Katherine Schultz (2001). Literacy and Learninjz out of School: A Review of Theory and Research [J]. Review of Educational Research, Vol. 71, No. 4, pp. 575- 611.
  • 4Peter Roberts (1995). Defining Literacy: Paradise,Nightmare or Red Herring? [J]. British Journal of Educational Studies. Vol. 43. No. 4. pp. 412-432.
  • 5OECD (1999). Measuring student knowledte and skills. A new framework for assessment. Paris: Orlanisation for Economic Co-operation and Develooment.
  • 6UNESCO. (2005). The Plurality of Literacy and Its Implications for Policies and. Pmlzrammes. UNESCO Education Sector Position Paoer. Paris: UNESCO.
  • 7Glvnda Hull and Katherine Schultz (2001). Literacy and Leaming out of School: A Review of Theory and Research [J]. Review of Educational Research,Vol. 71, No. 4, or. 575- 611.
  • 8OECD (1999). Measuring student knowledge and skills. A new framework for assessment. Pads: Orzanisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  • 9Sig J. Prais (2003). Cautions on OECD'S Recent Educational Survey (PISA) [J]. Oxford Review of Education, Vol. 29, No. 2 (Jun., 2003), pp. 139-163.
  • 10Peter Roberts (1995). Defining Literacy: Paradise, Nightmare or Red Herring? [J]. British Journal of Educational Studies, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 412-432.

共引文献116

同被引文献57

引证文献12

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部