期刊文献+

个体理想伴侣偏好的内隐—外显性差异研究 被引量:4

The Difference Between the Implicit and Explicit Preferences for Ideal Partner
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了探讨个体对于理想伴侣品质的内隐与外显偏好之间是否存在差异性,本研究以144名大学生为被试,采用伴侣品质偏好问卷以及内隐联想测验作为测量工具,结果发现:(1)个体对于伴侣品质具有内隐偏好,更倾向于将伴侣与积极的个人品质相联系;(2)个体对于理想伴侣品质的外显偏好与内隐偏好之间具有差异性,其中男性在9个伴侣品质的内隐-外显偏好上达到显著差异,女性在18个伴侣品质上达到显著差异。从对理想伴侣品质期待程度来说,女性对于理想伴侣品质追求更高于男性。 The present study discussed the differences between implicit and explicit preferences for ideal partner by completing the questionnaires about partner preferences and using the Implicit Association Test (IA T) in 144 un- dergraduates. The results revealed that: 1) Individuals showed an implicit partner preference for a positive per- sonal characteristic in a partner. 2) A significant difference between the implicit and explicit preferences for ide- al partner emerged in the research, given that men reached the differences in nine items and women in eighteen items. Women exhibited a higher demand in ideal partners' attributes than men.
出处 《心理与行为研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第4期551-561,共11页 Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(31571157) 国家社会科学基金教育学青年课题(CEA150174) 教育部长江学者支持计划 安徽大学学术与技术带头人引进工程
关键词 理想伴侣 伴侣品质 内隐联想测验 择偶偏好 ideal partner, partner attributes, IA T, partner preference.
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献71

  • 1许小玲.从择偶观的变迁看择偶标准的时代性——论中国女性建国至今50多年的配偶选择[J].武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版),2004,17(5):631-635. 被引量:17
  • 2乐国安,张彦彦,陈浩.西方有关择偶启事的研究和论争[J].心理科学进展,2005,13(2):248-256. 被引量:11
  • 3乐国安,陈浩,张彦彦.进化心理学择偶心理机制假设的跨文化检验——以天津、Boston两地征婚启事的内容分析为例[J].心理学报,2005,37(4):561-568. 被引量:52
  • 4Castellano, S. (2009b). Towards an information-processing theory of mate choice. Animal Behavior, 78, 1493-1497.
  • 5Dijksterhuis, A. (2004). Think different: The merits of unconscious thought in preference development and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 586-598.
  • 6Edland, A., & Svenson, O. (1993). Judgment and decision making under time pressure: Studies and findings. In Svenson, O. & Maule, A. J. (Eds.), Time Pressure and Stress in Human Judgment and Decision Making (pp. 27-38). New York: Plenum.
  • 7Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., Thomas, G., & Giles, L. (1999). Ideals in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 72-89.
  • 8Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M. & the ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • 9Goldstein, D. G., & Gigerenzer, G. (1999). The recognition heuristics: How ignorance makes us smart. In G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd & the ABC group. Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 37-58). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • 10Harrison, G. W., & McCabe, K. A, (1996). Stability and preference distortion in resource matching: An experimental study of the marriage problem. In R. M. Isaac (Ed.), Research in experimental economics (Vol.8).Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

共引文献31

同被引文献38

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部