期刊文献+

全国非中医类高等院校中医执业医师培养能力的评价分析 被引量:1

Evaluation of physician training ability in the non-traditional Chinese medicine colleges and universities
原文传递
导出
摘要 通过分析2013年-2015年非中医类高等院校全日制应届本科毕业生参加中医类别、中西医结合类别执业医师资格考试的参考人数、通过人数、通过率以及总通过率,来评价非中医类高等院校培养中医执业医师的能力。结果显示,2013年~2015年中医类别执业医师资格考试总通过率分别为60.41%、60.28%、60.62%,学校通过率最高为93.55%、90.oo%、90.53%,最低为34.04%、20.00%、27.74%;中西医结合类别执业医师资格考试总通过率分别为51.76%、47.52%、54.84%,学校通过率最高为83.33%、75.86%、84.55%,最低为25.00%、18.67%、24.15%。全国非中医类高等院校之间的执业医师资格考试通过率差距较大。虽然开设中医相关专业的高等院校数量较多,但实际培养中医执业医师的院校不多。将医师资格考试通过情况作为评价非中医类高等院校培养中医执业医师能力的指标之一,可为高等院校在中医相关专业的设置、学科建设和发展方向等方面提供参考。 This study aimed to analysis the pass rate (PR) in examination of doctors' qualification (EDQ) of the graduates in non-traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) colleges and university in 2013-2015 and to compare their ability. The data showed, the total PR of the TCM program in recent three years was 60. 41%, 60. 28%, 60. 62%. The top one was 93.55%, 90. 00% , 90. 53% , the lowest was 34.04% , 20. 00% ,27.74%. The total PR of the integrated Chinese and western medicine program in recent three years was 51.76%, 47. 52%, 54. 84%. The top one was 83.33% ,75. 86% ,84. 55%, the lowest was 25.00%, 18. 67% ,24. 15%. There was big disparity in the PR in the non-TCM colleges and universities. Although there are many colleges and universities set TCM related programs, but few have TCM physician training ability. Taking the PR as an index to evaluate the physician training ability among the non-TCM colleges and universities is helpful to them on setting TCM related programs, discipline construction and development.
出处 《中华医学教育杂志》 2017年第3期341-346,共6页 Chinese Journal of Medical Education
关键词 非中医类高等院校 医师资格考试 通过率 评价 Non-traditional Chinese medicine colleges and universities Examination of Doctors' qualification (EDQ) Pass rate (PR) Evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献40

共引文献28

同被引文献12

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部