期刊文献+

超声造影对胰腺癌与肿块型胰腺炎的鉴别诊断价值 被引量:18

Differential diagnostic value of pancreatic cancer and mass pancreatitis by contrast-enhanced ultrasound
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨超声造影对胰腺癌及肿块型胰腺炎的鉴别诊断价值,提高术前诊断符合率。方法选取我院经手术及病理确诊的胰腺癌患者32例(胰腺癌组)和肿块型胰腺炎患者28例(肿块型胰腺炎组),均行常规超声和超声造影检查,分析并比较两组超声造影时间-强度曲线各参数的差异;绘制常规超声和超声造影诊断胰腺良恶性肿块的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线并计算其曲线下面积,比较两种检查方法对胰腺良恶性肿块的诊断效能。结果超声造影静脉相:胰腺癌组不均质增强比例为77.14%,高于肿块型胰腺炎组(35.71%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。胰腺癌组上升时间、达峰时间、峰值强度分别为2.82 s、3.51 s、58.18 d B,与肿块型胰腺炎组(1.31 s、1.56 s、76.09 d B)比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);平均渡越时间比较差异无统计学意义。常规超声诊断胰腺癌及肿块性胰腺炎的ROC曲线下面积为0.544,敏感性为60.07%,特异性为53.12%,诊断符合率为56.66%。超声造影诊断胰腺癌及肿块性胰腺炎的ROC曲线下面积为0.780,敏感性为80.00%,特异性为73.33%,诊断符合率为76.67%,两者比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论超声造影对于胰腺癌及肿块型胰腺炎的诊断及鉴别诊断较常规超声更加准确和客观,有较高的临床应用价值。 Objective To investigate the value of contrast -enhanced ultrasound in differential diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and mass pancreatitis,and to improve the preoperative diagnostic accuracy. Methods Thirty-two patients with pancreatic cancer(pancreatic cancer group) and 28 patients with mass pancreatitis(mass pancreatitis group) were selected, all the patients were confirmed by surgery and pathology.Two groups were examined by conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound,the differences of the parameters of time-intensity curve between two groups were analyzed and compared. The receiver operating characteristics(ROC) curve of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in diagnosing benign and malignant pancreatic tumors were drew,and the area under the curve were calculated,the diagnostic efficacy of the two methods for detecting pancreatic masses were compared.Results Venous phase of contrast-enhanced ultrasound:pancreatic cancer group showed the proportion of inhomogeneous enhancement was 77.14%,which was higher than that in mass pancreatitis group(35.71%),the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.01).The AT,PI and TTP in pancreatic cancer group were 2.82 s, 3.51 s and 58.18 dB,and those in massive pancreatitis group were 1.31 s,1.56 s and 76.09 dB,the difference was statistically significant(all P〈0 . 05), the difference of mTT was not statistically significant . The area under the ROC curve of conventional ultrasound diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and mass pancreatitis was 0.544,sensitivity was 60.07%,specificity was 53.12%,and the diagnostic coincidence rate was 56.66%.The area under the ROC curve of contrast-enhanced ultrasound diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and mass pancreatitis was 0.780,sensitivity was 80.00%,specificity was 73.33%,and the diagnostic coincidence rate was 76.67%,the difference was statistically significant(all P〈0.05).Conclusion Compared with conventional ultrasound,contrast-enhanced ultrasound is more accurate and objective in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and mass pancreatitis,it has higher clinical value.
出处 《临床超声医学杂志》 2017年第8期526-530,共5页 Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine
基金 新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金项目(2015211070)
关键词 超声检查 造影剂 胰腺肿瘤 恶性 胰腺炎 肿块型 Ultrasonography Contrast agent Pancreatic tumor maligant Pancreatitis mass
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献30

  • 1Mirko D'Onofrio,Anna Gallotti,Francesco Principe,Roberto Pozzi Mucelli.Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the pancreas[J].World Journal of Radiology,2010,2(3):97-102. 被引量:8
  • 2何天霖,胡先贵,刘瑞,张怡杰,邵成浩,唐岩.原发性胰腺淋巴瘤的诊断和治疗(附9例报告)[J].第二军医大学学报,2005,26(8):875-876. 被引量:11
  • 3严昆,戴莹,王艳滨,尹珊珊,霍苓,杨薇,张晖,吴薇,陈敏华.超声造影对胰腺占位病变的诊断应用价值[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2006,15(5):361-364. 被引量:52
  • 4Mirko D'Onofrio,Giulia Zamboni,Alessia Tognolini,Roberto Malagò,Niccolò Faccioli,Luca Frulloni,Roberto Pozzi Mucelli.Mass-forming pancreatitis: Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2006,12(26):4181-4184. 被引量:29
  • 5陆奉驹,姚洁洁,周净,余鸽,李梅,余明玮,袁菁菁.超声造影时间强度曲线定量分析诊断肝局灶性病变的临床价值[J].上海医学影像,2006,15(4):274-277. 被引量:4
  • 6Flath B, Rickes S, Schweigert M, et al. Differentiation of pan creatic metastasis of a renal cell carcinoma from primary pancreat ic carcinoma by echo enhanced power Doppler sonography. Pan creatology, 2003,3(4) : 349-351.
  • 7D'Onofrio M, Malagb R, Zamboni G, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography better identifies pancreatic tumor vascularization than helical CT. Panereatology, 2005,5 (4-5) : 398-402.
  • 8Weidner N, Scruple JP, Welch WR, et al. Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis-correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. N Engl J Med, 1991,324(1):1-8.
  • 9Sugimoto H, Kaneko T, Hirota M, et al. Earlier hepatic vein transittime measured by contrast ultrasonography reflects intrahe patic hemodynamic changes accompanying cirrhosis. J Hepatol, 2002, 37(5) :578-583.
  • 10Kitano M, Kudo M, Maekawa K, et al. Dynamic imaging of pan creatic diseases by contrast-enhanced coded phase inversion harmonic ultrasonography. Gut, 2004,53(6) :85,1-859.

共引文献42

同被引文献102

引证文献18

二级引证文献63

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部