期刊文献+

负压吸引工作鞘在输尿管软镜处理>2 cm肾结石的初步应用 被引量:16

The clinical application of negative pressure ureteral access sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨负压吸引工作鞘(NPUAS)在输尿管软镜处理>2 cm肾结石的临床价值。方法回顾性分析广州医科大学附属第五医院泌尿外科2016年8月至2017年2月,应用NPUAS行输尿管软镜碎石术的25例肾结石患者的临床资料。分析手术时间、结石清除率,术后并发症发生率等数据。结果所有患者Ⅰ期均能成功置入NPUAS,并成功找到结石,完成碎石。结石直径2.0~3.0 cm,平均(2.3±0.3)cm。手术时间35~98 min,平均(64±16)min;术后平均住院时间(4.1±1.7)d。术后1个月结石清除率92.0%(23/25)。总并发症率8%(2/25)。术后发热2例,体温<38.5℃,予加强抗感染对症处理后痊愈。无大出血、输尿管石街、撕脱、穿孔等并发症发生。结论输尿管软镜联合负压吸引工作鞘治疗肾2~3 cm结石安全有效。 Objective To report the clinical application of negative pressure of ureteral access sheath(NPUAS) in retrograde intrarenal surgery(RIRS). Methods The data of 25 kidney stones cases who was treated with flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University between August 2016 and February 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. The operation time, stone-free rate and complications were evaluated. Results All patients were successfully treated with RIRS in one stage. The mean stone diameter was(2.3 ±0.3) cm, range from 2 to 3 cm. The mean operative time was(64±16) min. The average postoperative hospital stay was(4.1 ±1.7) days. The stone clearance rate was 92.0%(23/25) in the postoperative period of 1 month. The overall complication rate was 8%(2/25). After the operation, 2 cases suffered fever with body temperature <38.5℃.They were recovered after antiinfection treatment. There were no serious complications such as massive haemorrhage, ureteral steinstrasse, avulsion and perforation occured. Conclusion Retrograde intrarenal surgery with NPUAS is an effective method in the treatment of moderate-size kidney stone.
出处 《中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版)》 2017年第4期20-23,共4页 Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition)
基金 广东省临床教学基地教学改革研究项目(2015JDB085) 广州市教育系统创新团队项目(13C10) 广东省教育厅青年创新人才项目(2016KQNCX133)
关键词 输尿管软镜 肾结石 负压 吸引鞘 RIRS Renal stone Negative Pressure Sheath
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献78

  • 1曾国华,钟文,李逊,陈文忠,何朝辉,何永忠,雷鸣,吴开俊.微创经皮肾穿刺取石术中肾盂内压变化的临床研究[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2007,28(2):101-103. 被引量:155
  • 2Landman J, Venkatesh R, Ragab M, et al. Comparison of intrarenal pressure and irrigant flow during percutaneous nephroscopy with an indwelling ureteral catheter, ureteral occlusion balloon, and ureteral access sheath. Urology, 2002, 60: 584-587.
  • 3Troxel SA, Low RK. Renal intrapelvic pressure during percutaneous nephrolithotomy and its correlation with the development of postoperative fever. J Urol, 2002, 168: 1348-1351.
  • 4Zeng GH, Zhong W, Li X, et al. The influence of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal pelvic pressure in vivo. Surg Laparosc, Endosc Percutan Tech, 2007, 17: 307-310.
  • 5Shariei A, Akhavizadegan H, Aryanpoor A, et at. Frequency of post percutaneous nephrolithotomy fever and its contributing factors. BJU Int, 2004, 94: 270-271.
  • 6Mariappan P, Loong CW. Mid stream urine C&S test is a poor predictor of infected urine proximal to the obstructing ureteric stone or infected stones: a prospective clinical study.J Urol, 2004, 171: 2142-2145.
  • 7Dogan HS, Sahin A, Cetinkaya Y, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in percutaneous nephrolithotomy., prospective study in 81 patients. J Endourol, 2002, 16: 649-653.
  • 8陈亮 许清泉 王晓峰等.经皮肾镜碎石术后全身炎症反应综合征的危险因素分析.中华泌尿外科杂志,2008,29(3):173-176.
  • 9TolgaAkman,MuratBinbay,FarukOzgor,MesutUgurlu,ErdemTekinarslan,CemKezer,RahmiAslan,Ahmet YaserMuslumanoglu.Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde flexible nephrolithotripsy for the management of 2–4?cm stones: a matched‐pair analysis[J].BJU International.2012(9)
  • 10M. J. Bader,C. Gratzke,S. Walther,P. Weidlich,M. Staehler,M. Seitz,R. Sroka,O. Reich,C. G. Stief,B. Schlenker.Efficacy of retrograde ureteropyeloscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for intrarenal calculi &gt;2?cm[J].Urological Research.2010(5)

共引文献400

同被引文献158

引证文献16

二级引证文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部