期刊文献+

直接标价更好么?——来自网络借贷平台的经验 被引量:3

Is Posted-Price Mechanism Better?——Evidence from Online Lending Market
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着交易数据和信用数据的积累和完善,网络借贷的利率定价机制逐步演化到平台直接标价的形式。国内一家代表性网络借贷平台经历了这一变化,本文用倾向性分数匹配法对这一变化进行估计。研究发现,平台识别风险的效率提高,改善了贷款质量,表现为违约率的降低。标价机制上调了原本狭窄的期限利率区分度,改善了平台呈现的信息质量,从而影响了投资人的投标行为,获得了更快的投标速度、更高的投标比例以及更弱的羊群行为。相对于平台原先"借款人选择利率-平台审核借款人"的利率形成机制,平台标价具有信息优势,能够根据大数据对借款人的风险进行准确定价,利率区分度的提高改善了平台的信息质量,并影响了投资人的投标行为。加入利率区分度的模型很好地解释了上述变化。这说明,标价机制实现了更高的定价效率,达到了改善平台经营的目的。 As transaction data and credit data accumulate, interest price mechanism in peer-to-peer lending has moved to posted price mechanism. A leading peer-to-peer lending company in China has accomplished the promotion of loan quality and decreased default rate after changing to posted price mechanism. This step also improved investors bidding behaviors and bidding percentage, and decreased herding behavior. Using Propensity Score Match method, the author finds that compared to former price mechanism which can be concluded as "bor- rower chooses price-platform chooses borrower", platform under posted price has the information advantage to recognize and price loan interest. Posted price mechanism also increases interest distinction degree between good loan and bad loan to decrease information asymmetry, Interest rate discrimination perfectly explains all the changes in trading behavior. This attempt to post price mechanism improves platform' s operation performance.
作者 董辰珂
出处 《运筹与管理》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2017年第8期133-140,共8页 Operations Research and Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(71232003 71441020) 教育部博士学科点专项科研基金(20120002110085) 北京市社会科学基金(14JGA018)
关键词 平台标价 利率区分度 贷款质量 交易行为 posted price interest rate discrimination loan quality trading behavior
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献23

  • 1Belier A. , G. Borjas, M. Tienda, D. Bloom and G. Grenier. 1994. " Beauty and the Labor Market", The American Economic Review, 84(5) : 1174 - 1194.
  • 2Duarte J. , S. Siegel and L. Young. 2012. "Trust and Credit: the Role of Appearance in Peer - to - Peer Lending", Review of Financial Studies, 25 (8) : 2455 - 2484.
  • 3Freedman, S. , and G. Z. Jin. 2008. "Do Social Networks Solve Information Problems for Peer - to - Peer Lending? Evidence from Prosper. corn", Working Papers, College Park, MD: NET Institute.
  • 4Ghose A. , P.G. Ipeirotis and B. Li. 2012. "Designing Ranking Systems for Hotels on Travel Search Engines by Mining User - Generated and Crowdsourced Content", Marketing Science, 31 (3) : 493 - 520.
  • 5Guiso, L. , P. Sapienza and L. Zingales. 2004. "The Role of Social Capital in Financial Development", American Economic Review, 94 : 526 - 556.
  • 6Hancock J. T. , L.E. Curry, S. Goorha and M. Woodworth. 2007. "On Lying and Being Lied To : A Linguistic Analysis of Deception in Computer - Mediated Communication", Discourse Processes, 45 ( 1 ) :1 - 23.
  • 7Herzenstein M. , S. Sonenshein and U. M. Dholakia. 2011. "Tell Me a Good Story and I May Lend You Money: the Role of Narratives in Peer -to -Peer Lending Decisions", Journal of Marketing Research, 48 (SPL) : S138 - S149.
  • 8Klafft M.. 2008. "Peer to Peer Lending: Auctioning Micro Credits over the Internet," Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Information Systems, Technology and Management ( ICISTM 08 ), March, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
  • 9Larrimore L. , L. Jiang, J. Larrimore, M. David and G. Scott. 2011. "Peer to Peer Lending: the Relationship between Language Features, Trustworthiness and Persuasion Success", Journal of Applied Communication Research, 39( 1 ) : 19 37.
  • 10Loughran T. , and B. McDonald. 2014. "Measuring Readability in Financial Disclosures", The Journal of Finance, 69 (4) : 1643 - 1671.

共引文献54

同被引文献20

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部