期刊文献+

国际商事仲裁中仲裁员回避制度研究——兼论我国《仲裁法》的修改与完善

Research on the Arbitration Challenge System in International Commercial Arbitration and Modification and Improvement of China's Arbitration Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 仲裁作为一种重要的非诉讼争议解决方式,在如今新的国内外形势下,将发挥越来越重要的作用。仲裁回避制度是仲裁制度的重要组成部分之一,是实现仲裁公正、效益、意思自治的重要保障。我国《仲裁法》只对仲裁员回避作了粗略的规定,存在不少漏洞和问题,有待修正、补充和完善。文章基于对世界上主要仲裁机构仲裁规则的比较研究,建议我国《仲裁法》确立仲裁员回避的一般标准、细化回避情形、确立仲裁员信息披露制度、引入"理性人"规则以及进一步完善申请回避程序。 Under new changes of domestic and international situations, the arbitration, as an important alternative dispute resolution, will play a more crucial role. Arbitration challenge system is a significant part of arbitration system and the vital guarantee of the justice, benefits, autonomy of the will of arbitration. The legal provisions in current Arbitration Law are not perfect, which themselves need further explanation and clarification. According to a comparative study of the arbitration rules of major arbitration institutions in the world, this article provided some proposals: providing a general standard of the withdrawal, clarifying circumstances about withdrawal of arbitrator, establishing the system on information exposure, accepting the rule of rational man and reforming the procedure about the withdrawal.
作者 黄瑞焰
机构地区 浙江工商大学
出处 《浙江万里学院学报》 2017年第4期50-53,共4页 Journal of Zhejiang Wanli University
关键词 国际商事仲裁 仲裁员 仲裁员回避 《仲裁法》 international arbitration institution arbitrator arbitration challenge Arbitration Law
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献23

  • 19U. S. C. § 10(a)2000.
  • 2Christopher R. Drahozal, John M, Commercial Arbitration: Cases and Problems (Second Edition), Matthew Bender & Co. , 2007, pp. 382 - 387.
  • 3Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co. , 393 US. 145 (1968).
  • 4Lorraine M Brennan, High Courts Declines to Address Arbitrator Bias Standard, New York Law Journal, Monday, October 1,2007. http://www. Nylj. com. visited on October 12, 2007.
  • 5Merrick T. Rossein & Jennifer Hope, Disclosure and Disqualification Standards for Neutral Arbitrators: How Far to Cast the Net and What is Sufficient to Vacate Award, ST. John's Law Review, Vol. 81:203,2007 ,p. 212.
  • 6Cook Industries, Inc v C Itoh &Co (America) Inc, 449 F 2d 106, 107 -8 (2d Cir. 1971), cert denied, 405 US 921,92 S Ct 957, 30L Ed 2d 792 (1972).
  • 720F 3d 1043, 1046 (9th Cir. 1994).
  • 8714 F 2d 673 (7th Cir. 1983), cert denied, 464 US 1009 (1983).
  • 9AS Rau, On Integrity in Private Judging, 14 Arbitration International, 1998, p. 157.
  • 10Hong - Lin Yun&LAURENCE SHORE, Independence, Impartiality, and Immunity of Arbitrators - US and England Perspectives, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 52, October 2003, p. 948.

共引文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部