期刊文献+

输尿管软镜碎石术联合微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗部分鹿角状肾结石的有效性及安全性分析 被引量:3

Efficacy and safety of ureteroscopic lithotripsy combined with minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of partial staghorn renal calculi
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析输尿管软镜碎石术联合微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗部分鹿角状肾结石的有效性及安全性。方法将入我院治疗的84例部分鹿角状肾结石患者,根据治疗方法分为观察组与对照组,各42例。对照组采用微创经皮肾镜取石术,观察组采用输尿管软镜碎石术联合微创经皮肾镜取石术,比较两组患者的临床疗效。结果观察组Ⅰ期与综合结石清除率分别为90.48%、95.24%,分别高于对照组的47.62%、66.67%(P<0.05);术中出血量为(9.22±1.51)mL,少于对照组的(23.11±6.40)m L(P<0.05);并发症总发生率为2.38%,低于对照组的11.90%(P<0.05)。结论鹿角状肾结石患者实施输尿管软镜碎石术联合微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗,效果满意。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ureteroscopic lithotripsy combined with minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy on staghorn renal calculi. Methods A total of 84 cases of patients with staghorn renal calculi in our hospital were divided into observation group and control group according to the treatment methods, with 42 cases in each group. The control group used minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy, the observation group used uretero- seopie lithotripsy combined with minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy. The clinical effects between the two groups were compared. Results In the observation group, the removal rate of stone in the I stage were 90.48%, and compre- hensive removal rate was 95.24%, which were respectively higher than 47.62%, 66.67% in the control group (P〈0.05); the intraoperative bleeding was (9.22±1.51) mL in the observation group, which was significantly less than (23.11±6.40) mL in the control group (P〈0.05); the total incidence rate of complications in the observation group was 2.38%, which was lower than 11.90% in the control group (P〈0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of staghorn renal calculi, ureteroscopic lithotripsy combined with minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy has satisfactory effect.
作者 赵卫红 赵军
机构地区 渭南市中心医院
出处 《临床医学研究与实践》 2017年第25期63-64,共2页 Clinical Research and Practice
关键词 鹿角状肾结石 输尿管软镜碎石术 微创经皮肾镜取石术 staghorn renal calculi ureteroscopic lithotripsy minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献46

  • 1P.Sooriakumaran,R.Kaba,H.O.Andrews,N.P.N.Buchholz.Evaluation of the mechanisms of damage to flexible ureteroscopes and suggestions for ureteroscope preservation[J].Asian Journal of Andrology,2005,7(4):433-438. 被引量:26
  • 2李建兴,牛亦农,田溪泉,康宁,王学科.经皮肾镜气压弹道联合超声碎石术的安全性及疗效分析[J].中华医学杂志,2006,86(28):1975-1977. 被引量:165
  • 3曾国华,钟文,李逊,陈文忠,杨后猛,袁坚,何朝辉,何永忠,雷鸣,吴开俊.一期多通道微创经皮肾穿刺取石术治疗鹿角状结石[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2007,28(4):250-252. 被引量:71
  • 4Alken P, Hutschenreiter G, Gunther R, et al. Percutaneous stone manipulation. J Urol, 1982, 125 : 463-466.
  • 5Duvdevani M, Razvi H,Sofer M,et al . Third prize : contemporary percutaneous nephrolit hot ripsy : 1585 procedures in 1338 consecutive patient s. J Endourol, 2007,21:824-829.
  • 6Malhotra SK, Khaitan A, Goswami AK, et al. Monitoring of irrigation fluid absorption during Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: the use of 1% ethanolasa marker. Anaesthesia,2001,56 : 1103- 1106.
  • 7Glenn M P, James E L, Stephen Y N, et al. AUA Guideline on Management of Staghorn Calculi: Diagnosis and Treatment Recommendations[J]. The Journal of Urology, 2005, 173: 1991--2000.
  • 8Ramakrishnan P A, A1-Bulushi Y H, Medhat M, etal. Modified anatrophic nephrolithotomy: A useful treatment option for complete complex staghorn calculi [J]. CanJ Urol, 2006, 13(5):3261-3270.
  • 9Anoia E J, Paik M J,Resnick M I. Anathrophic Nephrolithotomy. In: Graham S D, Glenn J F. Glenn's urologic surgery [M]. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Asia I.td, 2004. 615--674.
  • 10Glenn M P, Dean G A, James E L, et al. AUA guide line on management of staghorn calculus: diagnosis and treatment recommendations[J]. J Urol, 2005,173 : 1991 - 2000.

共引文献221

同被引文献27

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部