期刊文献+

回到浦江 对滨江慢行系统及开放性的思考

Return to the Huangpu River Reflecting on the Riverside Slow Traffic System and Its Openness
下载PDF
导出
摘要 同为三角洲城市,上海与阿姆斯特丹的地貌有着极大相似性:水网密布,地势平坦。然而,两者的城景却大不相同。作为公认的滨水城市,在阿姆斯特丹骑行、步行,随时可达水岸。而上海的情况却恰好相反。是什么导致了两者的差异?文章从两座城市的滨江慢行系统规划展开,讨论如何以交通设施为基础,提升滨江带的开放性及多样性。 Both located in river delta regions,Shanghai and Amsterdam share many similarities in the geomorphic features:flat terrain and dense water network.However,the urban images of the two cities are widely different.As a well-known waterfront city,Amsterdam’s river banks are easily accessed by cyclists& pedestrians.While in Shanghai,the condition is the opposite.What does it cause the difference? Through comparing the planning of riverside slow traffic system in two cities,the article discusses how to improve the openness and diversity of riverside areas through the development of transportation infrastructure.
作者 王卓尔
机构地区 O筑设计
出处 《时代建筑》 2017年第4期36-43,共8页 Time + Architecture
关键词 阿姆斯特丹 上海 滨江 交通 慢行系统 开放性 Amsterdam Shanghai Riverside Traffic Slow Traffic System Openness
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献22

  • 1阿姆斯特丹艾河北岸住宅区规划和建筑设计[J].世界建筑导报,2006(10):96-96. 被引量:1
  • 2褚冬竹.荷兰的密码[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2012.
  • 3Swart, Johan, et al. "World Heritage Cities: Amsterdam' s Canal District Case Study'" Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Heritage and Sustainable Development[R]. 2012.
  • 4Dougill W.Amsterdam:Its Town Planning Development[J].Liverpool:Liverpool University Pres,2010.
  • 5Kahn,Dennis and Gerrit van der Plas. Amsterdam[J].Cities, 1999, 16(5):371-381.
  • 6North China Herald,Vol.1 No.1-August 3rd,1850,Saturday,p.1.
  • 7North China Herald,No.164-Sep.17,1853,p.28.
  • 8North China Herald No.223-November 4,1854,p.53.
  • 9Vol.VI,No.272-October 13,1855,p.43.
  • 10Vol.VI,No.273-October 20,1855,p.45.

共引文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部