期刊文献+

基于多代价的决策粗糙集属性约简 被引量:3

Attribute Reduction Based on Multicost Decision-theoretic Rough Set
下载PDF
导出
摘要 与经典粗糙集相比,传统的决策粗糙集将代价考虑在内,利用代价矩阵生成一对阈值。但决策粗糙集不具备经典粗糙集的单调性,这为粗糙集的属性约简带来了新的挑战。传统的决策粗糙集中的代价矩阵只有一个,没有考虑到代价的变化性。首先介绍了多代价决策粗糙集下的悲观决策规则和乐观决策规则的定义,利用多个代价矩阵来生成阈值,并将其用于属性约简中。在属性约简中,从单独的决策类出发而不是基于全部的决策类提出了启发式的Local属性约简方法,且从相关实验结果中可以得到,相对于基于全部的决策类的属性约简,Local属性约简在乐观条件下比在悲观条件下能获得更多的正域规则。 Compared with classic rough set, traditional decision-theoretic rough set takes the cost into consideration, using cost matrix to generate a pair of thresholds. But decision-theoretic rough set doesn~ t meet the monotonicity that has been widely used in classic rough set, which has brought a new challenge for us in the study of attribute reduction in rough set. Cost matrix in traditional decision-theoretic rough set is only one, doesn't think about the variability of cost. The pessimistic decision rules and the optimistic rules of muticost decision-theoretic rough set are introduced at first and the thresholds which generated by multiple cost matrix are applied to attribute reduction. An heuristic Local attribute reduction method is proposed not on whole decision class but rules from relevant experiment results in optimistic conditions on individual decision class, which can get more positive than in pessimistic conditions, when it compared with the method based on the whole decision class.
出处 《计算机科学》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第9期67-69,92,共4页 Computer Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(61572242 61272419 61305058 61373062) 江苏省青蓝工程人才项目 中国博士后科学基金(2014M550293)资助
关键词 决策粗糙集 多代价 三支决策 Decision-theoretic rough set, Multi-cost, Three-way decision-theoretic
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献25

  • 1Zdzislaw Pawlak. Rough sets [ J ]. International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences, 1982,11 ( 5 ) : 341-356.
  • 2Zdzislaw Pawlak, Wong S K M, Wojciech Ziarko. Rough sets : prob- abilistic versus deterministic approach [ J 1. International Journal of Man-machine Studies, 1988,29 ( 1 ) : 81-95.
  • 3Wojciech Ziarko. Variable precision rough set model[ J]. Journal of Computer and System Science, 1993,46 ( 1 ) :39-59.
  • 4Yao Yi-yu,Wong S K M. A decision theoretic framework for ap- proximating concepts [ J ]. International Journal of Man-machine Studies, 1992,37 ( 6 ) : 793-809.
  • 5Dominik Slezak, Wojciech Ziarko. The investigation of the Bayesianrough set model[ J ]. International Journal of Approximate Reason- ing,2005,40(1-2) :81-91.
  • 6Yao Yi-yu. Probabilistic rough set approximations[ J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2008,49 (2) : 255-271.7.
  • 7Joseph P Herbert, Yao Jing-tao. Learning optimal parameters in de- cision-theoretic rough sets [ C ]. In Proc. RSKT'09, Berlin Heidel- berg: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg ,2009:610-617.
  • 8Jia Xiu-yi,Li Wei-wei, Shang Lin, et al. An optimization viewpoint of decision-theoretic rough set model [ C ]. In Proc. RSKT' 11, Ber- lin Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2011:457-465.
  • 9Lin Feng-tse, Kao Cheng-yan, Hsu Ching-chi. Applying the genetic approach to simulated annealing in solving some NP-Hard problems [ J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1993, 23 (6) : 1752-1767.
  • 10Salwani Abdullah, Laleh Golafshan, Mohd Zakree Ahmad Nazri. Re-heat simulated annealing algorithm for rough set attribute re- duction [ J ]. International Journal of the Physical Sciences, 2011,6 ( 8 ) : 2083 -2089.

共引文献18

同被引文献19

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部