摘要
以单一制造商和单一零售商为研究对象,建立无碳减排和碳减排情形下以制造商为主导的Stackelberg差别定价博弈模型,求出供应链的最优定价和回收决策,进行比较分析,通过算例分析进行验证。分析表明,碳减排时能以较低的产品零售价获得较高的销售量,供应链系统利润高于无碳减排情形下的利润,并且碳减排后产品回收率有所提高。通过数值模拟分析得出,随着碳税的增多,两种情形下新产品的零售价、产品回收率均上升,销售量均减少,制造商和零售商的利润均呈下降的变化趋势。
The differential pricing Stackelberg model for both reducing and no reducing carbon emission scenarios is built, in which the closed-loop supply chain is consist of a manufacturer and a retailer. Comparing the optimal pricing and recycling strategies in two situations. The result shows that, when manufacturer considers reducing carbon emissions, it can get a low- er product retail price for higher sales. The profit of the closed - loop supply chain system and the product recovery rate is more than that of no carbon reduction. After analyzing the influences of carbon tax using the numerical simulation. It shows that, the retail price of new products and product recovery rate rises with the increasing of carbon tax , while sales of new products and profits of closed - loop supply chain are reduced.
出处
《软科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第9期138-144,共7页
Soft Science
基金
江苏省社会科学后期资助项目(14HQ005)
江苏省高校哲学社会科学重点研究基地开放课题(JDS213004)
南京邮电大学人文社会科学基金重点项目(NYS212015)
关键词
闭环供应链管理
再制造
碳减排
差别定价
closed-loop supply chains management
remanufacturing
carbon emission reduction
differential pricing
