基于社会学习理论的妊娠糖尿病综合管理模式的探讨被引量：8

Exploration of the Integrated Management Mode of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Based on Social Learning Theory

下载PDF

导出

摘要针对生活方式干预这一难点,整合多学科资源,围绕妊娠糖尿病患者血糖管理,以班杜拉的交互决定理论、观察学习理论和自我效能理论为指导,设计营养、运动、心理、产科、内分泌、血糖监测六个管理模块,利用个体化管理门诊、体验式课堂和宣教课堂等不同情景式平台环境,为患者提供健康生活方式和血糖自我管理的范式、方法和技能。通过观察学习、体验、多种强化刺激等,提高患者自我效能,使健康生活方式成为自觉行动,达到管理好血糖的目的。 Focusing on the difficulties of lifestyle intervention, we integrated multidisciplinary resources around the gestational diabetes mellitus patients with blood glucose management, with Bandura＆#39;s theory of interactive decision, observational learning theory and self-efficacy theory as a guide, designed six management modules of nutrition, exercise, psychology, obstetrics, endocrine and blood glucose monitoring.We used a variety of scenarios such as individualized outpatient, experiential and health education classroom to provide healthy lifestyle and self-management paradigm, methods and skills for patients.By observational learning, experience, a variety of enhanced stimulation, etc, self-efficacy of gestational diabetes mellitus patients was improved.Healthy lifestyle became their conscious action to achieve the purpose of managing blood sugar.

作者柳萍娄晓君王怡郝颖宋彦薇许欣欣 LIU Ping LOU Xiao-jun WANG Yi et al(Nutritional Department of Beijing First Hospital of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Beijing 100086, China)

机构地区北京市第一中西医结合医院营养科北京市第一中西医结合医院妇产科

出处《医学与哲学（B）》 2017年第7期87-90,共4页 Medicine & Philosophy(B)

基金 2014年北京市朝阳区科技计划项目(SF1423)

关键词妊娠糖尿病综合管理模式社会学习理论情景式平台 gestational diabetes mellitus integrated management mode social learning theory situational platform

分类号 R459 [医药卫生—治疗学] B84-05 [哲学宗教—基础心理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献2

1高峰,赵明杰.医患共同决策最新研究进展[J].医学与哲学（B）,2016,37(1):1-4. 被引量：35
2妊娠合并糖尿病诊治指南（2014）[J].中华围产医学杂志,2014(8):537-545. 被引量：301

二级参考文献16

1King V J,Davis M M,Gorman P N,et al. Perceptions of shared de- civsion making and decision aids among rural primary care clinicians [J]. Med Decis Making,2012,32(4):636-644.
2de Groot I B,Otten W, Dijs-Elsinga J,et al. Choosing between hos- pitals-the influence of the experiences of other patients[J]. Med Decis Making,2012,32(6):764-77S.
3Bynum J P,Barre L, Reed C, et al. Participation of very old adults in health care decisions[J]. Med Decis Making,2014,34(2):216-230.
4Fullwood C, Kennedy A, Rogers A, et al. Patients' experiences of shared decision making in primary care practices in the United king- dom[J]. Med Decis Making,2013 ,33(1):26-36.
5Shaffer V A, Zikmund-Fisher B J. All stories are not alike: a pur- pose-,content-,and valence-based taxonomy of patient narratives in decision aids[J]. Med Decis Making, 2013,33(1):4-13.
6McCaffery K J,Smith S KtWolf M. The Challenge of Shared Deci- sion Making Among Patients With Lower Literacy: A Framework for Research and Development[J]. Med Decis Making ,2010,30(1):35-44.
7Sepucha K RtMatlock D D, Wills C E, et al."It's Valid and Relia- ble" Is Not Enough !Critical Appraisal of Reporting of Measures in Trials Evaluating Patient Decision Aids[J]. Med Decis Making, 2014,34(5):560-566.
8Mliller-Engelmann M, Donner-Banzhoff N, Keller H,et al. When decisions should be shared:a study of social norms in medical deci- sion making using a factorial survey approach[J]. Med Decis Mak- ing,2013,33(1):37-47.
9Russell L B, Schwartz A. Looking at patients' choices through the lens of expected utility:a critique and research agenda[J]. Med De- cis Making,2012,32(4):527-531.
10Feidman-Stewart D,Tong C,Siemens R,et al. The impact of explic- it values clarification exercises in a patient decision aid emerges af- ter the decision is actually made: evidence from a randomized con- trolled trial[J], Med Decis Making,2012,32(4):616-626.