摘要
在保险实务中,投保人保险费的交付与保险入保险责任的承担密切相关。对于投保人未能依约支付保险费行为后果的认定,应结合合同具体约定,以“保险合同保障功能之发挥”及“被申请人利益之保护”等价值基点为导向。对于保险人预收保险费的行为,《最高人民法院关于适用(中华人民共和国保险法)若干问题的解释(二)》(以下简称《保险法司法解释(二)》)第4条虽具有极强的实务意义,同时也面临诸多质疑,而域外保险法制中的“临时保险合同”制度对于我国今后制度的改进或有借鉴意义。
In practice, the delivery of insurance premium is closely related to the undertaking of insured liability. To identify the legal results of policy-holder's failure to deliver insurance premium as a-greed properly, it is necessa for the judge/arbitrator to take into ac- count the purpose of insurance contract and the concept of protecting the interests of the insured. As for the condition that the insurer receives in- surance premium in advance, though the rule stipulated by the Judicial Interpretation ( II ) of Insurance Law is of practical significance, it subjects to multiple theoretical criticism. Therefore, the temporarily in- surance policy, which is a prevailing institution in common law counties, could be referred in the future practice and legislation for our country.
出处
《北京仲裁》
2017年第2期93-103,共11页
Beijing Arbitration Quarterly
关键词
保险费
保险责任
临时保险合同
预收保费
delivery of insurance premium
insured liability
thetemporarily insurance policy
receiving insurance premium in advance