唐宋变革论的误解与正解--仅以言必称内藤及会通论等为例

The Misunderstanding and Positive Solution to the Theory of Tang-Song Transition: A Case Study of the Words Must Be Called Naito Konan and the Theory of Integration

唐宋变革是个较为复杂的论题,只怕很难以"对"或"错"一字蔽之。唐宋变革论各式各样,然而如今学者每提及唐宋变革论,大有言必称内藤湖南之势。其实,日本学界有京都学派与东京学派之分,并非"内藤假说"一统天下。尤其值得注意的是,我国学者有自己的唐宋变革论,且源远流长,岂能数典忘祖。唐宋变革不是断裂,而是因革。包伟民新近提出的唐宋会通论,对唐宋变革论不是颠覆,而是补充和完善。唐宋变革论与会通论相辅相成、兼容互补、相得益彰。

Tang-Song transition is a more complex topic, it is difficult to judge whether it is ＂ right＂ or ＂wrong＂. The theory has a wide range of styles, but great words will be called Naito Konan when the scholars mention it. In fact, Japanese scholars have the Kyoto and the Tokyo school of thoughts, ＂Naito hypothesis＂ is not unified. Most noteworthy, Chinese scholars have our own theory of Tang-Song transition that has a long history, so we can＇t forget the number of ancestors. The theory of Tang-Song transition is not broken, but the inheritance and transformation. Bao Weimin recently proposed the theory of Tang-Song integration. According to the author, it is not the subversion of the Tang-Song transition, but the complement and perfection. The theory of Tang-Song transition and integration arc compatible and complementary, which brings out the best in each other.