期刊文献+

从阿诺德到威廉斯:近代以来西方文学经典理论溯源 被引量:2

From Arnold to Williams:Tracing to the Western Literary Classic Theory in Modern Times
下载PDF
导出
摘要 考察西方文学经典论争的理论源流,对于厘清国内近年来文学经典讨论中的话语缠绕,弄清论争各方背后的理论资源进而透视国内文学经典论争有着重要意义。文章在卡尔巴斯、约翰·杰洛瑞等人研究的基础上,分为五个时段,梳理了西方近代以来文学经典的理论谱系。可以看出:文学经典既是因不同价值标准而产生的"文化代表性样本序列",也是根植于作品本身的美学艺术典范,在关于文学经典的讨论和研究中,只有置身于当下新的文学实践和文化建构,才能显现其双重价值和意义。 It is of great significance to examine the theoretical origins of the classical literary controversy in western literature and to clarify the discourse in the discussion of classical classics in recent years and to clarify the theoretical resources behind the parties. On the basis of the study of thousands of people, such as Karlbas and John Guillory, this paper combs the theoretical pedigree of literary classics in modern times in five periods according to the classical classics and the cultural model. It can be seen that the literary classics are the different "cultural representative sample sequence" produced by the value standard and they are also the models of aesthetic art rooted in the works. In the discussion and study of literary classics, only in the current new literary practice and cultural construction would show its dual value and significance.
作者 张颖
出处 《西安财经学院学报》 CSSCI 2017年第5期105-110,共6页 Journal of Xi’an University of Finance & Economics
关键词 西方文学经典 中国文学经典论争 文学理论谱系 western literature classic chinese literature classics controversy literary theory pedigree
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献8

  • 1荣格.心理学与文学[M].冯川,等译.上海:上海三联书店,1987.
  • 2艾略特.传统和个人才能[A].艾略特诗学文集[M].北京:国际文化出版公司,1989.
  • 3哈罗德·布鲁坶影响的焦虑[M].南京:江苏教育出版社,2006.
  • 4罗德.布鲁姆.西方正典[M].南京:译林出版社,2006.
  • 5弗莱 陈慧 译.批评的剖析[M].天津:百花文艺出版社,1998..
  • 6弗莱.批评之路[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1998.
  • 7韦勒克,沃伦.文学理论[M].刘象愚,译.南京:江苏教育出版社,2005:219.
  • 8荣格.寻找精神的现代人[A].外国现代文艺批评方法论[M].江西人民出版社,1984.

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部