摘要
考察西方文学经典论争的理论源流,对于厘清国内近年来文学经典讨论中的话语缠绕,弄清论争各方背后的理论资源进而透视国内文学经典论争有着重要意义。文章在卡尔巴斯、约翰·杰洛瑞等人研究的基础上,分为五个时段,梳理了西方近代以来文学经典的理论谱系。可以看出:文学经典既是因不同价值标准而产生的"文化代表性样本序列",也是根植于作品本身的美学艺术典范,在关于文学经典的讨论和研究中,只有置身于当下新的文学实践和文化建构,才能显现其双重价值和意义。
It is of great significance to examine the theoretical origins of the classical literary controversy in western literature and to clarify the discourse in the discussion of classical classics in recent years and to clarify the theoretical resources behind the parties. On the basis of the study of thousands of people, such as Karlbas and John Guillory, this paper combs the theoretical pedigree of literary classics in modern times in five periods according to the classical classics and the cultural model. It can be seen that the literary classics are the different "cultural representative sample sequence" produced by the value standard and they are also the models of aesthetic art rooted in the works. In the discussion and study of literary classics, only in the current new literary practice and cultural construction would show its dual value and significance.
出处
《西安财经学院学报》
CSSCI
2017年第5期105-110,共6页
Journal of Xi’an University of Finance & Economics
关键词
西方文学经典
中国文学经典论争
文学理论谱系
western literature classic
chinese literature classics controversy
literary theory pedigree